public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: Mariusz Kozlowski <m.kozlowski@tuxland.pl>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, davem@davemloft.net,
	kernel-testers@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: 2.6.26-rc2-mm1: sparc64 - possible recursive locking detected
Date: Wed, 14 May 2008 11:41:50 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080514114150.acee5bb7.akpm@linux-foundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200805142029.40373.m.kozlowski@tuxland.pl>

On Wed, 14 May 2008 20:29:40 +0200 Mariusz Kozlowski <m.kozlowski@tuxland.pl> wrote:

> Hello,
> 
> 	Got this on sparc64 startup:

whoa.  A sparc64 tester?  Thanks!

> =============================================
> [ INFO: possible recursive locking detected ]
> 2.6.26-rc2-mm1 #2
> ---------------------------------------------
> modprobe/514 is trying to acquire lock:
>  (&cls->mutex){--..}, at: [<00000000005ff538>] device_add+0x3c0/0x5c0
> 
> but task is already holding lock:
>  (&cls->mutex){--..}, at: [<000000000060287c>] class_interface_register+0x44/0xe0
> 
> other info that might help us debug this:
> 1 lock held by modprobe/514:
>  #0:  (&cls->mutex){--..}, at: [<000000000060287c>] class_interface_register+0x44/0xe0
> 
> stack backtrace:
> Call Trace:
>  [000000000048cc64] __lock_acquire+0x104c/0x1400
>  [000000000048d098] lock_acquire+0x80/0xa0
>  [0000000000701898] mutex_lock_nested+0xc0/0x4e0
>  [00000000005ff538] device_add+0x3c0/0x5c0
>  [00000000005ff74c] device_register+0x14/0x20
>  [00000000005ff808] device_create+0xb0/0xe0
>  [0000000010012ef8] sg_add+0x160/0x380 [sg]
>  [00000000006028d4] class_interface_register+0x9c/0xe0
>  [0000000000617050] scsi_register_interface+0x18/0x40
>  [000000001001c0a4] init_sg+0xac/0x180 [sg]
>  [00000000004960c8] sys_init_module+0xb0/0x1c0
>  [00000000004463cc] sys32_init_module+0x14/0x20
>  [0000000000406294] linux_sparc_syscall32+0x3c/0x40
>  [0000000000013698] 0x136a0
> 

Yeah, this is a bug which has always been there, afaik.  A
semaphore was converted to a mutex.  Semaphores don't have lockdep
checking, but mutexes do, so we just now got to find out about it. 
Some finger-pointing is occurring over on the scsi list ;)

I assume the machine otherwise works OK?

  reply	other threads:[~2008-05-14 18:42 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 61+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-05-14  8:01 2.6.26-rc2-mm1 Andrew Morton
2008-05-14 11:24 ` [BUG] 2.6.26-rc2-mm1 - kernel bug while bootup at __alloc_pages_internal () on x86_64 Kamalesh Babulal
2008-05-14 17:36   ` Andrew Morton
2008-05-14 18:21     ` Kamalesh Babulal
2008-05-14 19:44       ` Andrew Morton
2008-05-15  1:54         ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2008-05-18  8:00         ` Kamalesh Babulal
2008-05-18 17:07           ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2008-05-19 14:49             ` Lee Schermerhorn
2008-05-14 14:03 ` [BUG] 2.6.26-rc2-mm1 - kernel BUG at fs/reiserfs/journal.c:1414! Kamalesh Babulal
2008-05-14 18:01   ` Andrew Morton
2008-05-14 15:34 ` [BUG] 2.6.26-rc2-mm1 - kernel panic at inet_create() on powerpc Kamalesh Babulal
2008-05-14 16:07   ` Paul E. McKenney
2008-05-14 20:05     ` Alexey Dobriyan
2008-05-14 20:32       ` Paul E. McKenney
2008-05-14 18:29 ` 2.6.26-rc2-mm1: sparc64 - possible recursive locking detected Mariusz Kozlowski
2008-05-14 18:41   ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2008-05-14 18:50     ` Mariusz Kozlowski
2008-05-14 19:12 ` 2.6.26-rc2-mm1 Torsten Kaiser
2008-05-14 19:35   ` 2.6.26-rc2-mm1 Andrew Morton
2008-05-15 17:44     ` 2.6.26-rc2-mm1 Torsten Kaiser
2008-05-15 18:49       ` 2.6.26-rc2-mm1 Andrew Morton
2008-05-14 20:39 ` 2.6.26-rc2-mm1 (WARN() build error) Randy Dunlap
2008-05-14 20:43 ` 2.6.26-rc2-mm1 (CONFIG_*FD build errors) Randy Dunlap
2008-05-14 20:49 ` 2.6.26-rc2-mm1 Zan Lynx
2008-05-14 21:00   ` 2.6.26-rc2-mm1 Andrew Morton
2008-05-14 21:14     ` 2.6.26-rc2-mm1 me
2008-05-14 22:06       ` 2.6.26-rc2-mm1 Zan Lynx
2008-05-14 21:13 ` 2.6.26-rc2-mm1 (SCSI_DH build errors) Randy Dunlap
2008-05-15 14:46   ` James Bottomley
2008-05-15 19:56     ` Chandra Seetharaman
2008-05-23  3:25       ` Andrew Morton
2008-05-23 19:39         ` Chandra Seetharaman
2008-05-23 20:28           ` Randy Dunlap
2008-05-24  1:16             ` Chandra Seetharaman
2008-05-14 21:16 ` 2.6.26-rc2-mm1: sloooow mkfs.ext2 Alexey Dobriyan
2008-05-14 21:33   ` Alexey Dobriyan
2008-05-15 21:41     ` Jiri Slaby
2008-05-14 21:16 ` 2.6.26-rc2-mm1 (p9 build error when 9P_FS=n) Randy Dunlap
2008-05-15  0:00   ` Eric Van Hensbergen
2008-05-15  0:05     ` Andrew Morton
2008-05-15  2:29       ` Eric Van Hensbergen
2008-05-15  3:04         ` Andrew Morton
2008-05-15  3:53           ` Eric Van Hensbergen
2008-05-14 21:54 ` 2.6.26-rc2-mm1 Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-05-15 17:58 ` [PATCH] Re: 2.6.26-rc2-mm1 - fix parenthesis in include/asm-arm/arch-omap/control.h Mariusz Kozlowski
2008-05-15 17:59 ` [PATCH] Re: 2.6.26-rc2-mm1 - fix parenthesis in include/asm-mips/gic.h Mariusz Kozlowski
2008-05-15 18:01 ` [PATCH] Re: 2.6.26-rc2-mm1 - fix parenthesis in include/asm-mips/mach-au1x00/au1000.h Mariusz Kozlowski
2008-05-15 18:21 ` [BUG] Re: 2.6.26-rc2-mm1 - x86_32 oops on modprobe wusbcore Mariusz Kozlowski
2008-05-15 18:58   ` Andrew Morton
2008-05-15 20:05     ` Inaky Perez-Gonzalez
2008-05-16 22:17 ` 2.6.26-rc2-mm1: high speed something Alexey Dobriyan
2008-05-16 21:31   ` Andrew Morton
2008-05-16 22:00     ` Greg KH
2008-05-17 10:28 ` 2.6.26-rc2-mm1 and Linus -git: LEDS_TRIGGER_DEFAULT_ON odd default Valdis.Kletnieks
2008-05-19 11:33 ` 2.6.26-rc2-mm1 - machine stuck while booting up with CONFIG_FTRACE_STARTUP_TEST enabled Kamalesh Babulal
2008-05-19 13:02   ` Steven Rostedt
2008-05-19 14:08     ` Kamalesh Babulal
2008-05-19 14:38       ` Steven Rostedt
2008-05-20 10:01 ` 2.6.26-rc2-mm1: possible circular locking dependency detected Mariusz Kozlowski
2008-05-20 10:22   ` Andrew Morton

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20080514114150.acee5bb7.akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --to=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=kernel-testers@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=m.kozlowski@tuxland.pl \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox