public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: "Torsten Kaiser" <just.for.lkml@googlemail.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Subject: Re: 2.6.26-rc2-mm1
Date: Wed, 14 May 2008 12:35:37 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080514123537.4df70e80.akpm@linux-foundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <64bb37e0805141212i7587a502vdff9af109b55c37b@mail.gmail.com>

On Wed, 14 May 2008 21:12:13 +0200
"Torsten Kaiser" <just.for.lkml@googlemail.com> wrote:

> On Wed, May 14, 2008 at 10:01 AM, Andrew Morton
> <akpm@linux-foundation.org> wrote:
> >
> >  ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.26-rc2/2.6.26-rc2-mm1/
> 
> Nice! This one works for me again.

Thanks.

> But somehow the NUMAness of my system is gone.
> 
> ...
>
> 
> The system is a dual socket Opteron system, each processor has 2 GB of RAM.
> 
> I will try to debug this more tomorrow, but except the kernel now
> thinks there is only one NUMA node the system works correct. It is
> detecting the full 4GB of RAM.
> 
> This line from 2.6.26-rc2-mm1 really looks like the source of this:
> [    0.000000] SRAT: PXMs only cover 0MB of your 4608MB e820 RAM. Not used.
> There is no more than 4GB of RAM (but part of it is remapped...)

I suspect that this might be caused by the below.

That patch no longer seems to be necessary so I'll drop it.  Perhaps
you could try reverting it, please?



From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>

x86.git testing found the following build error on latest -git:

 drivers/acpi/numa.c: In function 'acpi_numa_init':
 drivers/acpi/numa.c:226: error: 'NR_NODE_MEMBLKS' undeclared (first use in this function)
 drivers/acpi/numa.c:226: error: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once
 drivers/acpi/numa.c:226: error: for each function it appears in.)

with this config:

 http://redhat.com/~mingo/misc/config-Wed_Apr_30_22_42_42_CEST_2008.bad

i suspect we dont want SRAT parsing when CONFIG_HAVE_ARCH_PARSE_SRAT
is unset - but the fix looks a bit ugly. Perhaps we should define
NR_NODE_MEMBLKS even in this case and just let the code fall back
to some sane behavior?

Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
---

 drivers/acpi/numa.c |    4 ++++
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)

diff -puN drivers/acpi/numa.c~acpi-acpi_numa_init-build-fix drivers/acpi/numa.c
--- a/drivers/acpi/numa.c~acpi-acpi_numa_init-build-fix
+++ a/drivers/acpi/numa.c
@@ -176,6 +176,7 @@ acpi_parse_processor_affinity(struct acp
 	return 0;
 }
 
+#ifdef CONFIG_HAVE_ARCH_PARSE_SRAT
 static int __init
 acpi_parse_memory_affinity(struct acpi_subtable_header * header,
 			   const unsigned long end)
@@ -193,6 +194,7 @@ acpi_parse_memory_affinity(struct acpi_s
 
 	return 0;
 }
+#endif
 
 static int __init acpi_parse_srat(struct acpi_table_header *table)
 {
@@ -221,9 +223,11 @@ int __init acpi_numa_init(void)
 	if (!acpi_table_parse(ACPI_SIG_SRAT, acpi_parse_srat)) {
 		acpi_table_parse_srat(ACPI_SRAT_TYPE_CPU_AFFINITY,
 				      acpi_parse_processor_affinity, NR_CPUS);
+#ifdef CONFIG_HAVE_ARCH_PARSE_SRAT
 		acpi_table_parse_srat(ACPI_SRAT_TYPE_MEMORY_AFFINITY,
 				      acpi_parse_memory_affinity,
 				      NR_NODE_MEMBLKS);
+#endif
 	}
 
 	/* SLIT: System Locality Information Table */
_


  reply	other threads:[~2008-05-14 19:36 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 61+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-05-14  8:01 2.6.26-rc2-mm1 Andrew Morton
2008-05-14 11:24 ` [BUG] 2.6.26-rc2-mm1 - kernel bug while bootup at __alloc_pages_internal () on x86_64 Kamalesh Babulal
2008-05-14 17:36   ` Andrew Morton
2008-05-14 18:21     ` Kamalesh Babulal
2008-05-14 19:44       ` Andrew Morton
2008-05-15  1:54         ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2008-05-18  8:00         ` Kamalesh Babulal
2008-05-18 17:07           ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2008-05-19 14:49             ` Lee Schermerhorn
2008-05-14 14:03 ` [BUG] 2.6.26-rc2-mm1 - kernel BUG at fs/reiserfs/journal.c:1414! Kamalesh Babulal
2008-05-14 18:01   ` Andrew Morton
2008-05-14 15:34 ` [BUG] 2.6.26-rc2-mm1 - kernel panic at inet_create() on powerpc Kamalesh Babulal
2008-05-14 16:07   ` Paul E. McKenney
2008-05-14 20:05     ` Alexey Dobriyan
2008-05-14 20:32       ` Paul E. McKenney
2008-05-14 18:29 ` 2.6.26-rc2-mm1: sparc64 - possible recursive locking detected Mariusz Kozlowski
2008-05-14 18:41   ` Andrew Morton
2008-05-14 18:50     ` Mariusz Kozlowski
2008-05-14 19:12 ` 2.6.26-rc2-mm1 Torsten Kaiser
2008-05-14 19:35   ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2008-05-15 17:44     ` 2.6.26-rc2-mm1 Torsten Kaiser
2008-05-15 18:49       ` 2.6.26-rc2-mm1 Andrew Morton
2008-05-14 20:39 ` 2.6.26-rc2-mm1 (WARN() build error) Randy Dunlap
2008-05-14 20:43 ` 2.6.26-rc2-mm1 (CONFIG_*FD build errors) Randy Dunlap
2008-05-14 20:49 ` 2.6.26-rc2-mm1 Zan Lynx
2008-05-14 21:00   ` 2.6.26-rc2-mm1 Andrew Morton
2008-05-14 21:14     ` 2.6.26-rc2-mm1 me
2008-05-14 22:06       ` 2.6.26-rc2-mm1 Zan Lynx
2008-05-14 21:13 ` 2.6.26-rc2-mm1 (SCSI_DH build errors) Randy Dunlap
2008-05-15 14:46   ` James Bottomley
2008-05-15 19:56     ` Chandra Seetharaman
2008-05-23  3:25       ` Andrew Morton
2008-05-23 19:39         ` Chandra Seetharaman
2008-05-23 20:28           ` Randy Dunlap
2008-05-24  1:16             ` Chandra Seetharaman
2008-05-14 21:16 ` 2.6.26-rc2-mm1: sloooow mkfs.ext2 Alexey Dobriyan
2008-05-14 21:33   ` Alexey Dobriyan
2008-05-15 21:41     ` Jiri Slaby
2008-05-14 21:16 ` 2.6.26-rc2-mm1 (p9 build error when 9P_FS=n) Randy Dunlap
2008-05-15  0:00   ` Eric Van Hensbergen
2008-05-15  0:05     ` Andrew Morton
2008-05-15  2:29       ` Eric Van Hensbergen
2008-05-15  3:04         ` Andrew Morton
2008-05-15  3:53           ` Eric Van Hensbergen
2008-05-14 21:54 ` 2.6.26-rc2-mm1 Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-05-15 17:58 ` [PATCH] Re: 2.6.26-rc2-mm1 - fix parenthesis in include/asm-arm/arch-omap/control.h Mariusz Kozlowski
2008-05-15 17:59 ` [PATCH] Re: 2.6.26-rc2-mm1 - fix parenthesis in include/asm-mips/gic.h Mariusz Kozlowski
2008-05-15 18:01 ` [PATCH] Re: 2.6.26-rc2-mm1 - fix parenthesis in include/asm-mips/mach-au1x00/au1000.h Mariusz Kozlowski
2008-05-15 18:21 ` [BUG] Re: 2.6.26-rc2-mm1 - x86_32 oops on modprobe wusbcore Mariusz Kozlowski
2008-05-15 18:58   ` Andrew Morton
2008-05-15 20:05     ` Inaky Perez-Gonzalez
2008-05-16 22:17 ` 2.6.26-rc2-mm1: high speed something Alexey Dobriyan
2008-05-16 21:31   ` Andrew Morton
2008-05-16 22:00     ` Greg KH
2008-05-17 10:28 ` 2.6.26-rc2-mm1 and Linus -git: LEDS_TRIGGER_DEFAULT_ON odd default Valdis.Kletnieks
2008-05-19 11:33 ` 2.6.26-rc2-mm1 - machine stuck while booting up with CONFIG_FTRACE_STARTUP_TEST enabled Kamalesh Babulal
2008-05-19 13:02   ` Steven Rostedt
2008-05-19 14:08     ` Kamalesh Babulal
2008-05-19 14:38       ` Steven Rostedt
2008-05-20 10:01 ` 2.6.26-rc2-mm1: possible circular locking dependency detected Mariusz Kozlowski
2008-05-20 10:22   ` Andrew Morton

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20080514123537.4df70e80.akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --to=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=just.for.lkml@googlemail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox