From: "Carlos R. Mafra" <crmafra2@gmail.com>
To: "Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@us.ibm.com>
Cc: Adrian Bunk <bunk@kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
mhoffman@lightlink.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
lm-sensors@lm-sensors.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ibmaem: Fix 64-bit division on 32-bit platforms
Date: Wed, 14 May 2008 20:11:36 -0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080514231136.GA4308@beyonder.ift.unesp.br> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080514222704.GA11439@cs181133002.pp.htv.fi>
On Thu 15.May'08 at 1:27:04 +0300, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> On Thu, May 08, 2008 at 09:55:27PM -0700, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
> > On Thu, May 08, 2008 at 04:34:43PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> >
> > > This driver is littered with 64-bit divides and doesn't link on i386.
> > > I'll make it depend on CONFIG_64BIT for now.
> >
> > Oops, sorry, I didn't remember that one can't do 64-bit division on
> > i386. The patch below fixes that.
> > ---
> > ibmaem: Fix 64-bit division on 32-bit platforms
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Darrick J. Wong <djwong@us.ibm.com>
> > ---
> >
> > drivers/hwmon/ibmaem.c | 6 ++++--
> > 1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/hwmon/ibmaem.c b/drivers/hwmon/ibmaem.c
> > index 22fa7d6..f808ca3 100644
> > --- a/drivers/hwmon/ibmaem.c
> > +++ b/drivers/hwmon/ibmaem.c
> >...
> > @@ -864,9 +865,10 @@ static ssize_t aem_show_power(struct device *dev,
> >...
> > time = timespec_to_ns(&a) - timespec_to_ns(&b);
> > - time /= 1000;
> > + time = div_u64(time, 1000);
> >
> > - return sprintf(buf, "%llu\n", (after - before) * 1000000000 / time);
> > + return sprintf(buf, "%llu\n",
> > + div64_u64((after - before) * 1000000000, time));
> > }
> >...
>
> What are you actually trying to do here?
>
> Converting mJ/ns to uJ/s?
>
> Or do you want to convert mJ/ns to Watt in which case you should
> multiply "time" with 1000 instead of dividing it through 1000?
To avoid these kind of doubts may I suggest using the time
conversion definitions of include/linux/time.h?
It would be much easier to understand the intention with
NSEC_PER_SEC, USEC_PER_SEC etc (comments would also help)
> In any case you should only need one expensive 64bit division
> and you can fold the operation with 1000 into the second division.
I agree.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-05-14 23:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-05-08 18:08 [PATCH v3] ibmaem: New driver for power/energy/temp meters in IBM System X hardware Darrick J. Wong
2008-05-08 23:34 ` Andrew Morton
2008-05-09 4:55 ` [PATCH] ibmaem: Fix 64-bit division on 32-bit platforms Darrick J. Wong
2008-05-14 22:27 ` Adrian Bunk
2008-05-14 23:11 ` Carlos R. Mafra [this message]
2008-05-15 21:18 ` [PATCH v2] " Darrick J. Wong
2008-05-15 22:49 ` Carlos R. Mafra
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20080514231136.GA4308@beyonder.ift.unesp.br \
--to=crmafra2@gmail.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=bunk@kernel.org \
--cc=djwong@us.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lm-sensors@lm-sensors.org \
--cc=mhoffman@lightlink.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox