From: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@redhat.com>
To: "Huang, Ying" <ying.huang@intel.com>
Cc: nigel@nigel.suspend2.net,
Kexec Mailing List <kexec@lists.infradead.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>,
"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>,
Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] kexec based hibernation: a prototype of kexec multi-stage load
Date: Fri, 16 May 2008 09:40:24 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080516134024.GF6926@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080516032758.GD6926@redhat.com>
On Thu, May 15, 2008 at 11:27:58PM -0400, Vivek Goyal wrote:
> On Fri, May 16, 2008 at 10:56:15AM +0800, Huang, Ying wrote:
> > On Thu, 2008-05-15 at 19:25 -0700, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> > > "Huang, Ying" <ying.huang@intel.com> writes:
> > >
> > > > On Thu, 2008-05-15 at 11:39 -0700, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> > > > [...]
> > > >> 2) After we figure out our address read the stack pointer from
> > > >> a fixed location and simply set it. (This is my preference)
> > > >
> > > > Just for confirmation (My English is poor).
> > > >
> > > > Do you mean that kernel A just read the stack top as re-entry point,
> > > > regardless of whether it is return address or argument 1?
> > >
> > > What I was thinking was:
> > >
> > > In kernel A()
> > >
> > > relocate_new_kernel:
> > >
> > > ...
> > >
> > > call *%eax
> > >
> > > kexec_jump_back_entry:
> > > /* This code should be PIC so figure out where we are */
> > > call 1f
> > > 1:
> > > popl %edi
> > > subl $(1b - relocate_kernel), %edi
> > >
> > > /* Setup a safe stack */
> > > leal PAGE_SIZE(%edi), %esp
> > > ...
> > >
> > >
> > > Then in purgatory we can read the address of kexec_jump_back_entry
> > > by examining 0(%esp) and export it in whatever fashion is sane.
> > >
> > > However we reach kexec_jump_back_entry we should be fine.
> >
>
> Huang is making use of purgatory only for booting kernel B for the first
> time. Once the kernel B is booted, all the trasitions (A-->B and B<--A)
> happen without using purgatory. Just keep on jumping back and forth
> to "kexec_jump_back_entry".
>
> Probably not using purgatory for later transitions is justified as long as
> kernel code is simple and small. Otherwise we will shall have to teach
> purgatory also of special case of resuming kernel B or booting kernel B.
>
> > I think it is reasonable to enable jumping back and forth more than one
> > time. So the following should be possible:
> >
> > 1. Jump from A to B (actually jump to purgatory, trigger the boot of B)
> > 2. Jump from B to A
> > 3. Jump from A to B again (jump to the kexec_jump_back_entry of B)
> > 4. Jump from B to A
> > ...
> >
> > So it should be possible to get the re-entry point of kernel B in
> > kexec_jump_back_entry of kernel A too. So I think in
> > kexec_jump_back_entry, the caller's stack should be checked to get
> > re-entry point of peer. And the stack state is different depend on where
> > come from, from relocate_new_kernel() or return.
> >
>
> To me this idea also looks good. So control flow will look something
> as follows?
>
> relocate_new kernel:
>
> if (!preserve_context)
> set registers to known state.
> jump to purgatory.
> else
> goto jump-back-setup:
>
> jump-back-setup:
> - Color the stack.
> move $0xffffffff 0(%esp)
>
> - call %edx
>
Thinking more about it, probably we don't have to separate out preserve
context and normal kexec path. Both can transition to purgatory using
call %edx. Coloring the stack should not harm in normal kexec.
Thanks
Vivek
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-05-16 13:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-05-12 6:40 [PATCH] kexec based hibernation: a prototype of kexec multi-stage load Huang, Ying
2008-05-13 5:34 ` Vivek Goyal
2008-05-14 1:57 ` Huang, Ying
2008-05-14 2:56 ` Vivek Goyal
2008-05-14 3:37 ` Huang, Ying
2008-05-14 21:43 ` Eric W. Biederman
2008-05-15 2:40 ` Huang, Ying
2008-05-15 4:57 ` Huang, Ying
2008-05-15 18:39 ` Eric W. Biederman
2008-05-16 1:41 ` Huang, Ying
2008-05-16 2:25 ` Eric W. Biederman
2008-05-16 2:56 ` Huang, Ying
2008-05-16 3:27 ` Vivek Goyal
2008-05-16 13:40 ` Vivek Goyal [this message]
2008-05-18 1:59 ` Eric W. Biederman
2008-05-16 3:33 ` Eric W. Biederman
2008-05-16 2:00 ` Vivek Goyal
2008-05-16 2:19 ` Huang, Ying
2008-05-16 2:55 ` Eric W. Biederman
2008-05-16 4:52 ` Huang, Ying
2008-05-16 13:36 ` Vivek Goyal
2008-05-16 11:58 ` Pavel Machek
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20080516134024.GF6926@redhat.com \
--to=vgoyal@redhat.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
--cc=kexec@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nigel@nigel.suspend2.net \
--cc=pavel@ucw.cz \
--cc=rjw@sisk.pl \
--cc=ying.huang@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox