Re: [PATCH] modules: Use a better scheme for refcounting

Mike Travis
2008-05-19T18:04:34Z

Christoph Lameter wrote:
> On Sat, 17 May 2008, Eric Dumazet wrote:
>
>> Thats a lot of work and apparently Mike and Christoph are doing it.
>
> Indeed. Thanks for the support. I hope Mike gets the stuff out soon. I
> know he was working on one issue that cause the zero based stuff to break.
> Maybe it would help if he would post what he has so far?

I'm re-basing it on the x86/latest tree as sched/latest was failing my tests
last week on both the AMD and Intel boxes. As soon as I re-verify everything
I'll send it in.

Thanks,
Mike