From: Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@gmail.com>
To: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@goop.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
"Maciej W. Rozycki" <macro@linux-mips.org>,
Tom Spink <tspink@gmail.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@gmail.com>, Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>,
Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC] x86: merge nmi_32-64 to nmi.c
Date: Sun, 18 May 2008 13:13:26 +0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080518091326.GD6948@cvg> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <482FE9CA.4090804@goop.org>
[Jeremy Fitzhardinge - Sun, May 18, 2008 at 09:33:14AM +0100]
> Cyrill Gorcunov wrote:
>> I think I would prefer Maciej's advice then but with capital
>> letters (to easy distinguish them and point an attention) like
>>
>> #ifdef CONFG_X86_64
>> #define CPU_64 1
>> #else
>> #define CPU_64 0
>> #endif
>
> The other problem in this case is that cpu_pda() doesn't exit for 32-bit,
> so it probably won't compile anyway. But in general, I fully support using
> if (constant) over #ifdef (?: not so much).
>
> J
>
yep, you're right - gcc doesn't throw it out but tries to evaluate in any
case so this trick with () ? : ; would not work :( or we should define
dummy types for this case...
- Cyrill -
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-05-18 9:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-05-17 19:22 [RFC] x86: merge nmi_32-64 to nmi.c Cyrill Gorcunov
2008-05-17 20:28 ` Tom Spink
2008-05-17 20:52 ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2008-05-17 21:40 ` Thomas Gleixner
2008-05-18 7:25 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2008-05-18 7:38 ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2008-05-18 8:33 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2008-05-18 8:47 ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2008-05-18 9:13 ` Cyrill Gorcunov [this message]
2008-05-18 9:09 ` Thomas Gleixner
2008-05-18 9:35 ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2008-05-18 18:08 ` Adrian Bunk
2008-05-18 18:13 ` Andi Kleen
2008-05-18 18:35 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2008-05-18 19:13 ` Andi Kleen
2008-05-19 14:27 ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2008-05-18 18:33 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2008-05-18 19:29 ` Adrian Bunk
2008-05-18 19:51 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2008-05-18 18:38 ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2008-05-18 20:40 ` Adrian Bunk
2008-05-18 10:15 ` Andi Kleen
2008-05-18 10:20 ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2008-05-18 10:25 ` Andi Kleen
2008-05-18 10:29 ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2008-05-18 12:07 ` Tom Spink
2008-05-18 12:10 ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2008-05-17 21:48 ` Mikael Pettersson
2008-05-17 22:34 ` Thomas Gleixner
2008-05-18 6:24 ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2008-05-18 10:04 ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2008-05-18 10:09 ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2008-05-19 18:07 ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2008-05-19 18:41 ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2008-05-21 7:41 ` Cyrill Gorcunov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20080518091326.GD6948@cvg \
--to=gorcunov@gmail.com \
--cc=andi@firstfloor.org \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=jeremy@goop.org \
--cc=jirislaby@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=macro@linux-mips.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=sam@ravnborg.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=tspink@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox