From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1757024AbYERKUP (ORCPT ); Sun, 18 May 2008 06:20:15 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752900AbYERKUE (ORCPT ); Sun, 18 May 2008 06:20:04 -0400 Received: from earthlight.etchedpixels.co.uk ([81.2.110.250]:56572 "EHLO lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752846AbYERKUD (ORCPT ); Sun, 18 May 2008 06:20:03 -0400 Date: Sun, 18 May 2008 11:08:12 +0100 From: Alan Cox To: Johannes Weiner Cc: Alan Cox , Jiri Slaby , Linux Kernel Mailing List Subject: Re: bug in `tty: BKL pushdown'? Message-ID: <20080518110812.5485de20@core> In-Reply-To: <87wslsuzk8.fsf@saeurebad.de> References: <87wslsuzk8.fsf@saeurebad.de> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.3.1 (GTK+ 2.12.5; x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu) Organization: Red Hat UK Cyf., Amberley Place, 107-111 Peascod Street, Windsor, Berkshire, SL4 1TE, Y Deyrnas Gyfunol. Cofrestrwyd yng Nghymru a Lloegr o'r rhif cofrestru 3798903 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > I have yet to test a current kernel version with this patch reverted > because I am too sleepy right now to solve the conflicts. That wouldn't actually be a useful test if you did as the locking changes would then bite you. The patch in question should just be a locking change so short of compiler bugs ought to be fairly easy to audit. I will dig into it next week. Alan