public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Paul Mundt <lethal@linux-sh.org>
To: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] binfmt_elf_fdpic: Magical stack pointer index, for NEW_AUX_ENT compat.
Date: Mon, 19 May 2008 13:41:41 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080519044141.GA10077@linux-sh.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <12478.1210936953@redhat.com>

On Fri, May 16, 2008 at 12:22:33PM +0100, David Howells wrote:
> Paul Mundt <lethal@linux-sh.org> wrote:
> 
> > While implementing binfmt_elf_fdpic on SH it quickly became apparent
> > that SH was the first platform to support both binfmt_elf_fdpic and
> > binfmt_elf, as well as the only of the FDPIC platforms to make use of the
> > auxvt.
> > 
> > Currently binfmt_elf_fdpic uses a special version of NEW_AUX_ENT() where
> > the first argument is the entry displacement after csp has been adjusted,
> > being reset after each adjustment. As we have no ability to sort this out
> > through the platform's ARCH_DLINFO, this index needs to be managed
> > entirely in create_elf_fdpic_tables(). Presently none of the platforms
> > that set their own auxvt entries are able to do so through their
> > respective ARCH_DLINFOs when using binfmt_elf_fdpic.
> > 
> > In addition to this, binfmt_elf_fdpic has been looking at
> > DLINFO_ARCH_ITEMS for the number of architecture-specific entries in the
> > auxvt. This is legacy cruft, and is not defined by any platforms in-tree,
> > even those that make heavy use of the auxvt. AT_VECTOR_SIZE_ARCH is
> > always available, and contains the number that is of interest here, so we
> > switch to using that unconditionally as well.
> > 
> > As this has direct bearing on how much stack is used, platforms that have
> > configurable (or dynamically adjustable) NEW_AUX_ENT calls need to either
> > make AT_VECTOR_SIZE_ARCH more fine-grained, or leave it as a worst-case
> > and live with some lost stack space if those entries aren't pushed (some
> > platforms may also need to purposely sacrifice some space here for
> > alignment considerations, as noted in the code -- although not an issue
> > for any FDPIC-capable platform today).
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Paul Mundt <lethal@linux-sh.org>
> 
> Acked-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>

As the SH FDPIC stuff depends on this, I'll fold this in to my 2.6.27
tree with the above Acked-by, which will trickle in to -mm and linux-next
directly.

      reply	other threads:[~2008-05-19  4:43 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-05-16  9:01 [PATCH] binfmt_elf_fdpic: Magical stack pointer index, for NEW_AUX_ENT compat Paul Mundt
2008-05-16 11:22 ` David Howells
2008-05-19  4:41   ` Paul Mundt [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20080519044141.GA10077@linux-sh.org \
    --to=lethal@linux-sh.org \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox