From: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
To: Avi Kivity <avi@qumranet.com>
Cc: Mark McLoughlin <markmc@redhat.com>,
Anthony Liguori <aliguori@us.ibm.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] virtio_net: free transmit skbs in a timer
Date: Mon, 19 May 2008 11:52:27 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200805191152.28409.rusty@rustcorp.com.au> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <48303CB9.7070406@qumranet.com>
On Monday 19 May 2008 00:27:05 Avi Kivity wrote:
> Rusty Russell wrote:
> > OK. And since the current situation is that the host doesn't throttle,
> > the feature bit should be "don't throttle, host is doing it for you", and
> > Mark's patch should go in...
>
> Yes.
>
> We should have thought of this before, though, especially as Xen does
>
> this or something very similar:
> > /* Shared ring page */ \
> > struct __name##_sring { \
> > RING_IDX req_prod, req_event; \
> > RING_IDX rsp_prod, rsp_event; \
> > uint8_t pad[48]; \
> > union __name##_sring_entry ring[1]; /* variable-length */ \
> > }; \
>
> req_event and rsp_event allow the other side to indicate when it wants a
> notification.
Well, we do have such a thing, in the ring suppression flags. Note that DaveM
is talking about moving network tx queue into the net drivers themselves,
which will make them much more efficient (ie. drain entire queue before
kick), which may again change the balance of what the Right Thing is.
I'll merge Mark's patch, and look at hacking up a feature to change behaviour
to never suppress tx-done interrupts.
Thanks,
Rusty.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-05-19 6:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-04-30 14:31 [PATCH] virtio_net: free transmit skbs in a timer Mark McLoughlin
2008-05-02 10:55 ` Rusty Russell
2008-05-12 20:37 ` Mark McLoughlin
2008-05-13 7:47 ` Avi Kivity
2008-05-14 6:07 ` Rusty Russell
2008-05-14 8:59 ` Avi Kivity
2008-05-15 15:29 ` Mark McLoughlin
2008-05-15 15:32 ` Avi Kivity
2008-05-15 23:25 ` Rusty Russell
2008-05-18 6:40 ` Avi Kivity
2008-05-18 14:16 ` Rusty Russell
2008-05-18 14:27 ` Avi Kivity
2008-05-19 1:52 ` Rusty Russell [this message]
2008-05-19 10:26 ` Avi Kivity
2008-05-19 12:21 ` Rusty Russell
2008-05-19 13:26 ` Avi Kivity
2008-05-20 1:37 ` Rusty Russell
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200805191152.28409.rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
--to=rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
--cc=aliguori@us.ibm.com \
--cc=avi@qumranet.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=markmc@redhat.com \
--cc=virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox