From: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
To: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@goop.org>
Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>, Theodore Tso <tytso@mit.edu>,
Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>,
Jeff Garzik <jeff@garzik.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org,
Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>,
Matt Mackall <mpm@selenic.com>,
Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] lguest: virtio-rng support
Date: Mon, 19 May 2008 19:28:12 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200805191928.13043.rusty@rustcorp.com.au> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <48314419.4080606@goop.org>
On Monday 19 May 2008 19:10:49 Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:
> Rusty Russell wrote:
> > On Saturday 17 May 2008 17:47:01 Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:
> >> But the host->guest protocol should include the number of bits estimated
> >> entropy along with the bits themselves.
> >
> > If we go down that path, we have to come up with a way of feeding that
> > information to guest userspace. Patches welcome. If we meanwhile assume
> > entropy == #bits, it fits the current /dev/hwrng model, and we can add an
> > entropy count later if we want to change that.
>
> Really? Wouldn't guest userspace just use /dev/random as usual, which I
> think does have an ioctl to give that kind of information? And the
> interfaces do allow things injecting entropy into the kernel pool to
> provide entropy estimates along with the actual bits themselves.
Unfortunately not. Hardware randomness devices export /dev/hwrng, and it's up
to userspace to feed that into /dev/random (or not). That's usually done by
rngd, which at least on my system, assumes 1 bit of entropy per bit of data
from /dev/hwrng by default.
I was a little surprised that this decision was exported to userspace, but if
you're not prepared to unconditionally trust hw rngs, it makes sense to palm
it off. We could write a boutique device for virtualization which *did* feed
directly, but that would be a little gauche.
Cheers,
Rusty.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-05-19 9:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-05-15 18:48 Virt RNG? Jeff Garzik
2008-05-15 19:53 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2008-05-15 20:26 ` Dor Laor
2008-05-15 20:31 ` Christian Borntraeger
2008-05-15 20:44 ` Jeff Garzik
2008-05-15 20:43 ` Jeff Dike
2008-05-15 23:43 ` Rusty Russell
2008-05-16 0:07 ` Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
2008-05-16 5:31 ` [PATCH 1/2] virtio: hardware random device Rusty Russell
2008-05-16 5:39 ` [PATCH 2/2] lguest: virtio-rng support Rusty Russell
2008-05-16 10:49 ` Johannes Berg
2008-05-16 20:25 ` H. Peter Anvin
2008-05-17 4:46 ` Rusty Russell
2008-05-17 4:50 ` H. Peter Anvin
2008-05-17 6:28 ` Rusty Russell
2008-05-17 6:43 ` Herbert Xu
2008-05-17 7:43 ` Christian Borntraeger
2008-05-17 15:56 ` H. Peter Anvin
2008-05-17 7:47 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2008-05-19 9:05 ` Rusty Russell
2008-05-19 9:10 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2008-05-19 9:28 ` Rusty Russell [this message]
2008-05-19 9:45 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2008-05-17 15:57 ` H. Peter Anvin
2008-05-16 7:31 ` [PATCH 1/2] virtio: hardware random device Christian Borntraeger
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200805191928.13043.rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
--to=rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
--cc=borntraeger@de.ibm.com \
--cc=herbert@gondor.apana.org.au \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=jeff@garzik.org \
--cc=jeremy@goop.org \
--cc=johannes@sipsolutions.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mpm@selenic.com \
--cc=tytso@mit.edu \
--cc=virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox