[PATCH] Make

[Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com>]

Arjan noted that the list_head debugging is BUG'ing when it detects
corruption.  By causing the box to panic immediately, we're possibly
losing some bug reports.   Changing this to a WARN_ON should mean
we at the least start seeing reports collected at kerneloops.org

[ I chose to BUG() when I first added that code, because I was
  chasing a bug which caused a lockup anyway, so it made little difference
  to me. ]

Signed-off-by: Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com>

diff --git a/lib/list_debug.c b/lib/list_debug.c
index 4350ba9..09f28bf 100644
--- a/lib/list_debug.c
+++ b/lib/list_debug.c
@@ -24,13 +24,13 @@ void __list_add(struct list_head *new,
 		printk(KERN_ERR "list_add corruption. next->prev should be "
 			"prev (%p), but was %p. (next=%p).\n",
 			prev, next->prev, next);
-		BUG();
+		WARN_ON(1);
 	}
 	if (unlikely(prev->next != next)) {
 		printk(KERN_ERR "list_add corruption. prev->next should be "
 			"next (%p), but was %p. (prev=%p).\n",
 			next, prev->next, prev);
-		BUG();
+		WARN_ON(1);
 	}
 	next->prev = new;
 	new->next = next;
@@ -64,12 +64,12 @@ void list_del(struct list_head *entry)
 	if (unlikely(entry->prev->next != entry)) {
 		printk(KERN_ERR "list_del corruption. prev->next should be %p, "
 				"but was %p\n", entry, entry->prev->next);
-		BUG();
+		WARN_ON(1);
 	}
 	if (unlikely(entry->next->prev != entry)) {
 		printk(KERN_ERR "list_del corruption. next->prev should be %p, "
 				"but was %p\n", entry, entry->next->prev);
-		BUG();
+		WARN_ON(1);
 	}
 	__list_del(entry->prev, entry->next);
 	entry->next = LIST_POISON1;

-- 
http://www.codemonkey.org.uk