From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S935013AbYEUGtQ (ORCPT ); Wed, 21 May 2008 02:49:16 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1759072AbYEUGtD (ORCPT ); Wed, 21 May 2008 02:49:03 -0400 Received: from mga06.intel.com ([134.134.136.21]:57821 "EHLO orsmga101.jf.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756377AbYEUGtC (ORCPT ); Wed, 21 May 2008 02:49:02 -0400 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.27,519,1204531200"; d="scan'208";a="283478483" From: Inaky Perez-Gonzalez Organization: Intel Corporation To: Henrique de Moraes Holschuh Subject: Re: [PATCH 09/15] rfkill: add the WWAN radio type Date: Tue, 20 May 2008 23:48:38 -0700 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.9 Cc: Ivo van Doorn , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Thomas Renninger , "John W. Linville" , "David S. Miller" References: <1211136485-19878-1-git-send-email-hmh@hmh.eng.br> <200805202035.20529.inaky@linux.intel.com> <20080521034213.GE26427@khazad-dum.debian.net> In-Reply-To: <20080521034213.GE26427@khazad-dum.debian.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200805202348.39807.inaky@linux.intel.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tuesday 20 May 2008, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote: > On Tue, 20 May 2008, Inaky Perez-Gonzalez wrote: > > > Stuff like "WiMax", "802.1a", "EDGE", "GRPS", "802.1bg" would be the > > > type, and class would be "WLAN", "WWAN", etc. > > > > > > We would only deal with classes on rfkill-input. Anything else more > > > specific should be done in userspace instead, disabling rfkill-input. > > > > How would this apply to the case where I want to use the HW key to switch > > one off and turn the other one off (say I have both a WiMAX and EDGE > > cards in my machine); how could we do it to distinguish which key is which? > > I might be missing something. > > I don't understand. Switch one off and turn the other one off? Isn't > that the same thing? -EOPERATORISDUMB, sorry; I meant turn one off and the other on. -- Inaky