From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S933223AbYEUAzU (ORCPT ); Tue, 20 May 2008 20:55:20 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1756699AbYEUAzF (ORCPT ); Tue, 20 May 2008 20:55:05 -0400 Received: from zeniv.linux.org.uk ([195.92.253.2]:39270 "EHLO ZenIV.linux.org.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756671AbYEUAzE (ORCPT ); Tue, 20 May 2008 20:55:04 -0400 Date: Wed, 21 May 2008 01:55:02 +0100 From: Al Viro To: Harvey Harrison Cc: jgarzik@pobox.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] misc drivers/net endianness noise Message-ID: <20080521005502.GF28946@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> References: <20080521003430.GB28946@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> <1211330880.5915.236.camel@brick> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1211330880.5915.236.camel@brick> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, May 20, 2008 at 05:48:00PM -0700, Harvey Harrison wrote: > I was contemplating an api like: > > void put_le16(u16 val, __le16 *ptr) > { > *ptr = cpu_to_le16(val); > } > > which would allow the above to become: > > if (catc->is_f5u011) > put_be16(skb->len, tx_buf); > else > put_le16(skb->len, tx_buf); > > Thoughts? Do not grow API too much. Mental savings on recognizing what's done are offset by need to remember more helper functions...