From: Benoit Boissinot <bboissin@gmail.com>
To: Soumyadip Das Mahapatra <kernelhacker@visualserver.org>
Cc: Akinobu Mita <akinobu.mita@gmail.com>,
Harvey Harrison <harvey.harrison@gmail.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] bitreversal program
Date: Wed, 21 May 2008 11:11:11 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080521091111.GU7567@pirzuine> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0805211029250.1736@visualserver.org>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 718 bytes --]
On Wed, May 21, 2008 at 10:54:15AM +0200, Soumyadip Das Mahapatra wrote:
> On Tue, 20 May 2008, Benoit Boissinot wrote:
>
> Sorry to disturb you again. But i tested my code against Akinobu's one
> and the test result shows my code takes less cpu time than that of
> Akinobu's.
>
> My processor is 1.4 GHz one.
> I am not forcing you to review my code( or i've no expectation of
> inclusion of it ) but its just a curiousity: what is truth behind
> the output.
I'm using a core duo 1.2GHz, if you want to play with the code, I'm
attaching a tarball (it's hackish, just change the #include at the top
of bitrev.h to switch implementation).
I'm using gcc -Wall -O3 to compile with gcc 4.2.3.
regards,
Benoit
--
:wq
[-- Attachment #2: bitrev.tar.bz2 --]
[-- Type: application/octet-stream, Size: 1520 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-05-21 9:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-05-19 17:04 [PATCH 1/2] bitreversal program Soumyadip Das Mahapatra
2008-05-19 20:42 ` Harvey Harrison
2008-05-20 6:53 ` John Hubbard
2008-05-20 11:01 ` Soumyadip Das Mahapatra
2008-05-20 12:13 ` Akinobu Mita
2008-05-20 15:25 ` Soumyadip Das Mahapatra
2008-05-20 15:47 ` Benoit Boissinot
2008-05-20 15:57 ` Soumyadip Das Mahapatra
2008-05-20 16:39 ` Benoit Boissinot
2008-05-21 8:54 ` Soumyadip Das Mahapatra
2008-05-21 9:11 ` Benoit Boissinot [this message]
2008-05-21 11:11 ` Rene Herman
2008-05-21 16:52 ` Tilman Schmidt
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20080521091111.GU7567@pirzuine \
--to=bboissin@gmail.com \
--cc=akinobu.mita@gmail.com \
--cc=harvey.harrison@gmail.com \
--cc=kernelhacker@visualserver.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox