From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S935623AbYEVJ1n (ORCPT ); Thu, 22 May 2008 05:27:43 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1760533AbYEVJ1c (ORCPT ); Thu, 22 May 2008 05:27:32 -0400 Received: from ozlabs.org ([203.10.76.45]:33702 "EHLO ozlabs.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752213AbYEVJ1b (ORCPT ); Thu, 22 May 2008 05:27:31 -0400 From: Rusty Russell To: "Denis V. Lunev" Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] modules: proper cleanup of kobject without CONFIG_SYSFS Date: Thu, 22 May 2008 19:20:22 +1000 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.9 Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Kay Sievers , Greg Kroah-Hartman References: <1211277589-8565-1-git-send-email-den@openvz.org> <1211277589-8565-3-git-send-email-den@openvz.org> In-Reply-To: <1211277589-8565-3-git-send-email-den@openvz.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200805221920.22920.rusty@rustcorp.com.au> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tuesday 20 May 2008 19:59:48 Denis V. Lunev wrote: > kobject: '' (ffffffffa0104050): is not initialized, yet kobject_put() Thanks Denis. This patch masks a deeper problem; looks like you can't load any modules with CONFIG_SYSFS=n: kernel/module.c: int mod_sysfs_init(struct module *mod) { int err; struct kobject *kobj; if (!module_sysfs_initialized) { printk(KERN_ERR "%s: module sysfs not initialized\n", mod->name); err = -EINVAL; goto out; } AFAICT, module_sysfs_initialized is not ever set if !CONFIG_SYSFS. I can't see the point of module_sysfs_initialized. It was introduced by Greg in commit 823bccfc ("remove "struct subsystem" as it is no longer needed"). Greg, what were you trying to do here? Modules can't be loaded before param_sysfs_init(): are you trying to handle the case where the kset_create_and_add() fails? Thanks, Rusty.