* [PATCH] apm_emu: push BKL down into ioctl handlers
@ 2008-05-22 20:23 Alan Cox
2008-05-22 20:40 ` Sam Ravnborg
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Alan Cox @ 2008-05-22 20:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-kernel, rmk
Part of the elimination of the old lock based ioctl. This one can
probably lose the remaining BKL pretty trivially
Signed-off-by: Alan Cox <alan@redhat.com>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] apm_emu: push BKL down into ioctl handlers
2008-05-22 20:23 [PATCH] apm_emu: push BKL down into ioctl handlers Alan Cox
@ 2008-05-22 20:40 ` Sam Ravnborg
2008-05-22 22:17 ` Alan Cox
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Sam Ravnborg @ 2008-05-22 20:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Alan Cox; +Cc: linux-kernel, rmk
On Thu, May 22, 2008 at 09:23:41PM +0100, Alan Cox wrote:
> Part of the elimination of the old lock based ioctl. This one can
> probably lose the remaining BKL pretty trivially
>
> Signed-off-by: Alan Cox <alan@redhat.com>
-ENOPATCH
Sam
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] apm_emu: push BKL down into ioctl handlers
2008-05-22 20:40 ` Sam Ravnborg
@ 2008-05-22 22:17 ` Alan Cox
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Alan Cox @ 2008-05-22 22:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Sam Ravnborg; +Cc: linux-kernel, rmk
On Thu, 22 May 2008 22:40:59 +0200
Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org> wrote:
> On Thu, May 22, 2008 at 09:23:41PM +0100, Alan Cox wrote:
> > Part of the elimination of the old lock based ioctl. This one can
> > probably lose the remaining BKL pretty trivially
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Alan Cox <alan@redhat.com>
> -ENOPATCH
Must be race between the sending gnomes and the pasting gnome ;)
diff --git a/drivers/char/apm-emulation.c b/drivers/char/apm-emulation.c
index cdd876d..4ea7188 100644
--- a/drivers/char/apm-emulation.c
+++ b/drivers/char/apm-emulation.c
@@ -29,6 +29,7 @@
#include <linux/completion.h>
#include <linux/kthread.h>
#include <linux/delay.h>
+#include <linux/smp_lock.h>
#include <asm/system.h>
@@ -292,8 +293,7 @@ static unsigned int apm_poll(struct file *fp, poll_table * wait)
* Only when everyone who has opened /dev/apm_bios with write permission
* has acknowledge does the actual suspend happen.
*/
-static int
-apm_ioctl(struct inode * inode, struct file *filp, u_int cmd, u_long arg)
+static long apm_ioctl(struct file *filp, u_int cmd, u_long arg)
{
struct apm_user *as = filp->private_data;
int err = -EINVAL;
@@ -301,6 +301,8 @@ apm_ioctl(struct inode * inode, struct file *filp, u_int cmd, u_long arg)
if (!as->suser || !as->writer)
return -EPERM;
+ lock_kernel();
+
switch (cmd) {
case APM_IOC_SUSPEND:
mutex_lock(&state_lock);
@@ -378,7 +380,7 @@ apm_ioctl(struct inode * inode, struct file *filp, u_int cmd, u_long arg)
mutex_unlock(&state_lock);
break;
}
-
+ unlock_kernel();
return err;
}
@@ -443,7 +445,7 @@ static struct file_operations apm_bios_fops = {
.owner = THIS_MODULE,
.read = apm_read,
.poll = apm_poll,
- .ioctl = apm_ioctl,
+ .unlocked_ioctl = apm_ioctl,
.open = apm_open,
.release = apm_release,
};
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2008-05-22 22:30 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2008-05-22 20:23 [PATCH] apm_emu: push BKL down into ioctl handlers Alan Cox
2008-05-22 20:40 ` Sam Ravnborg
2008-05-22 22:17 ` Alan Cox
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox