From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755603AbYEWLth (ORCPT ); Fri, 23 May 2008 07:49:37 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1754823AbYEWLtB (ORCPT ); Fri, 23 May 2008 07:49:01 -0400 Received: from mg.nix.la ([75.126.232.227]:52185 "EHLO mg.nix.la" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751196AbYEWLst (ORCPT ); Fri, 23 May 2008 07:48:49 -0400 X-Greylist: delayed 1315 seconds by postgrey-1.27 at vger.kernel.org; Fri, 23 May 2008 07:48:49 EDT From: Anton Petrusevich To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: PostgreSQL pgbench performance regression in 2.6.23+ Date: Fri, 23 May 2008 13:26:43 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.9 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200805231326.44247.casus@casus.us> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi guys! >> I.e. i think it's a perfectly fine answer to say "if your workload needs >> batch scheduling, run it under SCHED_BATCH". > Yes, and this appears to be such a case. Excuse me for interrupting you, but am I getting this right: to run effectively PostgreSQL with an active web app on the server a "system administrator Joe" has to know about batch scheduling? -- Anton Petrusevich