From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1760951AbYEXRp7 (ORCPT ); Sat, 24 May 2008 13:45:59 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1757809AbYEXRpw (ORCPT ); Sat, 24 May 2008 13:45:52 -0400 Received: from smtp119.sbc.mail.sp1.yahoo.com ([69.147.64.92]:34025 "HELO smtp119.sbc.mail.sp1.yahoo.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S1751617AbYEXRpw (ORCPT ); Sat, 24 May 2008 13:45:52 -0400 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=pacbell.net; h=Received:X-YMail-OSG:X-Yahoo-Newman-Property:From:To:Subject:Date:User-Agent:Cc:References:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Disposition:Message-Id; b=ivOCZyU3Vkza3J/ZY0oVekQdK2KC/p0iX0H6xqS5HcO3Vi0fqOnMv7pTzZconjHhszeVzUOY+i8z7lDtBo0vWAa/EMSsqH4BqnToUlAa5Xx36165GgQd9Va8iaYqniD7bTVxOjYqqA8d6QtpMrezuNIXdn3A4HEEMRq+/dd8/C8= ; X-YMail-OSG: 2YuUyBkVM1kSiKMPKxRC.hbg7GjEaJznz3XD4Z15bGqUvj878AfDUBgc4dlxS8YOSxlXoKwenRcWbMEtcAjyppYC0VtWpfYIdI5i6gbVoDJHw0haWMmq6Fl3vYEMk6.ViAc- X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 From: David Brownell To: "Grant Likely" Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] spi: Add OF binding support for SPI busses Date: Sat, 24 May 2008 10:45:47 -0700 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.9 Cc: "Jochen Friedrich" , fabrizio.garetto@gmail.com, linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, spi-devel-general@lists.sourceforge.net References: <20080516193054.28030.35126.stgit@trillian.secretlab.ca> <48384D13.6010608@scram.de> In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200805241045.47448.david-b@pacbell.net> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Saturday 24 May 2008, Grant Likely wrote: > > Isn't the same true for drivers/of/gpio.c or drivers/of/of_i2c.c, as well? > > I would argue 'yes!' ... all the more reason to have the SPI glue go there too, matching the ACPI/PCI precedent as well as those others!