From: "Kristian Høgsberg" <krh@bitplanet.net>
To: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
Cc: "Rik van Riel" <riel@redhat.com>,
"Kristian Høgsberg" <krh@redhat.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] Use structs instead of hardcoded offsets in x86 boot decompressor.
Date: Sun, 25 May 2008 00:25:27 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080525042527.GA12989@bitplanet.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4838E5D4.4050708@zytor.com>
On Sat, May 24, 2008 at 09:06:44PM -0700, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> Rik van Riel wrote:
>> On Fri, 23 May 2008 23:17:01 -0700
>> "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Uhm... except it doesn't live at address zero, at all.
>>>
>>> It's called "zeropage" because we used to recycle it into
>>> empty_zero_page, a long long time ago.
>>>
>>> The bootparms structure is pointed to by %esi being passed from the setup
>>> code to the decompressor to the kernel.
>>
>> Then why does dereferencing the uninitialized
>> pointer work, both in the code before and after
>> the patch?
>>
>> What am I misssing?
>
> Heck if I know. It definitely *shouldn't* work...
Damn, I lost a chunk of the patch. There's supposed to be a
rm_screen_info = &real_mode->screen_info;
after the real_mode = rmode assignment. In the code before,
RM_SCREEN_INFO was a macro that just referenced the real_mode pointer:
#define RM_SCREEN_INFO (*(struct screen_info *)(real_mode+0))
Thanks, wil resend.
Kristian
prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-05-25 4:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-05-23 21:59 [PATCH 1/2] Use structs instead of hardcoded offsets in x86 boot decompressor Kristian Høgsberg
2008-05-23 21:59 ` [PATCH 2/2] Only print "Decompressing Linux" etc when 'noisy' is passed Kristian Høgsberg
2008-05-23 22:42 ` Johannes Weiner
2008-05-24 9:25 ` Mikael Pettersson
2008-05-24 18:07 ` Diego Calleja
2008-05-24 1:07 ` [PATCH 1/2] Use structs instead of hardcoded offsets in x86 boot decompressor Rik van Riel
2008-05-24 6:17 ` H. Peter Anvin
2008-05-25 4:03 ` Rik van Riel
2008-05-25 4:06 ` H. Peter Anvin
2008-05-25 4:25 ` Kristian Høgsberg [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20080525042527.GA12989@bitplanet.net \
--to=krh@bitplanet.net \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=krh@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=riel@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox