From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1759321AbYEYT6R (ORCPT ); Sun, 25 May 2008 15:58:17 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1756566AbYEYT6E (ORCPT ); Sun, 25 May 2008 15:58:04 -0400 Received: from mail.issp.bas.bg ([195.96.236.10]:52257 "EHLO mail.issp.bas.bg" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756491AbYEYT6D (ORCPT ); Sun, 25 May 2008 15:58:03 -0400 From: Marin Mitov Organization: Institute of Solid State Physics To: Steven Rostedt Subject: Re: [PATCH -v4] x86: enable preemption in delay Date: Sun, 25 May 2008 22:58:10 +0300 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.9 Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <200805252108.25011.mitov@issp.bas.bg> In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200805252258.10584.mitov@issp.bas.bg> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sunday 25 May 2008 10:30:25 pm Steven Rostedt wrote: > > On Sun, 25 May 2008, Marin Mitov wrote: > > > Hi Steven, > > > > look at this patch, proposed by me and Ingo few month ago. > > I think it solves the problem you had fond, but unfortunately > > it had been lost (not included in the mainline). > > > > http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/11/20/343 > > > > It is against the kernel at the moment the message was sent. > > I think it could be applied to the current kernel too. > > > > Hi Marin, > > That patch looks basically like what I did. But mine has less code and is How much "less code" :-) > a bit simpler ;-) :-) Marin Mitov > > Thanks, > > -- Steve >