Re: can UBIFS be taken to linux-next?

[Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>]

On Wed, 28 May 2008 11:41:12 +1000 Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> wrote:

> Hi Artem,
> 
> On Tue, 27 May 2008 09:18:07 +0300 Artem Bityutskiy <Artem.Bityutskiy@nokia.com> wrote:
> >
> > we would like to ask for UBIFS mainline inclusion the next merge window.
> > Of course we cannot say for sure whether Linus will merge it or not,
> > but it would be helpful to have it in your tree for some time anyway.
> > UBIFS is already in -mm tree so I assume it should not have too many
> > build issues.
> 
> OK, my requirements are that you intend for it to be integrated in the
> next merge window, that it be reviewed and that it be unit tested (i.e.
> tested as well as you can in isolation).  You seem to have done all that,
> so I will add it.
> 
> I will put it at the end of the merge today.
> 
> Andrew, does that make sense to you?

I'm not aware of any issues which would block a 2.6.27 merge.

I haven't reviewed the filesystem myself.  Christoph Hellwig seems to
have had a good go through it and had numerous review comments, but it
is unclear what stage things are at with addressing them?