From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1757687AbYE1Cac (ORCPT ); Tue, 27 May 2008 22:30:32 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752848AbYE1CaY (ORCPT ); Tue, 27 May 2008 22:30:24 -0400 Received: from smtp1.linux-foundation.org ([140.211.169.13]:46088 "EHLO smtp1.linux-foundation.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753152AbYE1CaY (ORCPT ); Tue, 27 May 2008 22:30:24 -0400 Date: Tue, 27 May 2008 19:29:42 -0700 From: Andrew Morton To: Stephen Rothwell Cc: Artem.Bityutskiy@nokia.com, Linux Kernel Mailing List Subject: Re: can UBIFS be taken to linux-next? Message-Id: <20080527192942.f4e3dd7b.akpm@linux-foundation.org> In-Reply-To: <20080528114112.b8600074.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> References: <483BA79F.9030100@nokia.com> <20080528114112.b8600074.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> X-Mailer: Sylpheed 2.4.8 (GTK+ 2.12.5; x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, 28 May 2008 11:41:12 +1000 Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi Artem, > > On Tue, 27 May 2008 09:18:07 +0300 Artem Bityutskiy wrote: > > > > we would like to ask for UBIFS mainline inclusion the next merge window. > > Of course we cannot say for sure whether Linus will merge it or not, > > but it would be helpful to have it in your tree for some time anyway. > > UBIFS is already in -mm tree so I assume it should not have too many > > build issues. > > OK, my requirements are that you intend for it to be integrated in the > next merge window, that it be reviewed and that it be unit tested (i.e. > tested as well as you can in isolation). You seem to have done all that, > so I will add it. > > I will put it at the end of the merge today. > > Andrew, does that make sense to you? I'm not aware of any issues which would block a 2.6.27 merge. I haven't reviewed the filesystem myself. Christoph Hellwig seems to have had a good go through it and had numerous review comments, but it is unclear what stage things are at with addressing them?