From: Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@gmail.com>
To: "Maciej W. Rozycki" <macro@linux-mips.org>
Cc: hpa@zytor.com, tglx@linutronix.de, mingo@redhat.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [patch 06/11] x86: nmi_32/64.c - use apic_write_around instead of apic_write
Date: Wed, 28 May 2008 20:25:27 +0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080528162527.GB6910@cvg> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.55.0805281712200.29522@cliff.in.clinika.pl>
[Maciej W. Rozycki - Wed, May 28, 2008 at 05:13:08PM +0100]
| On Wed, 28 May 2008, Cyrill Gorcunov wrote:
|
| > Could you take a look please on
| >
| > http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/5/26/146
| >
| > i'm investigateting what is happening (Adrian pointed on
| > main reason I think) but can't understand why is that.
|
| Do you have a link with the patch included?
|
| Maciej
|
Here is the patch itself:
---
x86: nmi_32.c - add nmi_watchdog_default helper
Signed-off-by: Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@gmail.com>
---
Index: linux-2.6.git/arch/x86/kernel/nmi_32.c
====================================================================
--- linux-2.6.git.orig/arch/x86/kernel/nmi_32.c 2008-05-24 13:01:21.000000000 +0400
+++ linux-2.6.git/arch/x86/kernel/nmi_32.c 2008-05-24 13:04:20.000000000 +0400
@@ -51,6 +51,17 @@ static DEFINE_PER_CPU(short, wd_enabled)
static int endflag __initdata = 0;
+/* Run after command line and cpu_init init, but before all other checks */
+void nmi_watchdog_default(void)
+{
+ if (nmi_watchdog != NMI_DEFAULT)
+ return;
+ if (lapic_watchdog_ok())
+ nmi_watchdog = NMI_LOCAL_APIC;
+ else
+ nmi_watchdog = NMI_IO_APIC;
+}
+
#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
/* The performance counters used by NMI_LOCAL_APIC don't trigger when
* the CPU is idle. To make sure the NMI watchdog really ticks on all
@@ -437,12 +448,8 @@ int proc_nmi_enabled(struct ctl_table *t
return -EIO;
}
- if (nmi_watchdog == NMI_DEFAULT) {
- if (lapic_watchdog_ok())
- nmi_watchdog = NMI_LOCAL_APIC;
- else
- nmi_watchdog = NMI_IO_APIC;
- }
+ /* if nmi_watchdog is not set yet, then set it */
+ nmi_watchdog_default();
if (nmi_watchdog == NMI_LOCAL_APIC) {
if (nmi_watchdog_enabled)
Index: linux-2.6.git/include/asm-x86/nmi.h
====================================================================
--- linux-2.6.git.orig/include/asm-x86/nmi.h 2008-05-24 13:00:50.000000000 +0400
+++ linux-2.6.git/include/asm-x86/nmi.h 2008-05-24 13:04:51.000000000 +0400
@@ -38,11 +38,9 @@ static inline void unset_nmi_pm_callback
#ifdef CONFIG_X86_64
extern void default_do_nmi(struct pt_regs *);
-extern void nmi_watchdog_default(void);
-#else
-#define nmi_watchdog_default() do {} while (0)
#endif
+extern void nmi_watchdog_default(void);
extern void die_nmi(char *str, struct pt_regs *regs, int do_panic);
extern int check_nmi_watchdog(void);
extern int nmi_watchdog_enabled;
---
So I've moved a part of code (32bit) from proc_nmi_enabled() to
nmi_watchdog_default() BUT this nmi_watchdog_default() also called
from smpboot.c:native_smp_prepare_cpus() and before this patch
this call was just an empty call (and eliminated by gcc I think)
now it's not empy. But how it leads to hang I can't understand.
The only thing is done - nmi_watchdog is set to NMI_LOCAL_APIC
or NMI_IO_APIC and my only suspicious is that something happens
asynchronously and leads to machine hang. Let me know if I wrote
in obscure manner.
- Cyrill -
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-05-28 16:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20080524153630.669797039@gmail.com>
2008-05-24 15:36 ` [patch 01/11] x86: nmi - unify die_nmi() interface Cyrill Gorcunov
2008-05-24 15:36 ` [patch 02/11] x86: nmi - die_nmi() output message unification Cyrill Gorcunov
2008-05-24 15:36 ` [patch 03/11] x86: nmi_64.c - move do_nmi(), stop_nmi() and restart_nmi() implementation to traps_64.c Cyrill Gorcunov
2008-05-24 15:36 ` [patch 04/11] x86: nmi_32.c - add "panic" option Cyrill Gorcunov
2008-05-24 15:36 ` [patch 05/11] x86: nmi_32.c - add nmi_watchdog_default helper Cyrill Gorcunov
2008-05-24 15:36 ` [patch 06/11] x86: nmi_32/64.c - use apic_write_around instead of apic_write Cyrill Gorcunov
2008-05-28 15:35 ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2008-05-28 16:04 ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2008-05-28 16:13 ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2008-05-28 16:25 ` Cyrill Gorcunov [this message]
2008-05-28 17:09 ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2008-05-28 17:16 ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2008-05-28 17:47 ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2008-05-28 18:32 ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2008-05-24 15:36 ` [patch 07/11] x86: nmi_32.c - unknown_nmi_panic_callback should always panic on being called Cyrill Gorcunov
2008-05-24 15:36 ` [patch 08/11] x86: nmi_64.c - use for_each_possible_cpu helper instead of for statement Cyrill Gorcunov
2008-05-24 15:36 ` [patch 09/11] x86: nmi_32.c cleanup - use for_each_online_cpu helper Cyrill Gorcunov
2008-05-24 15:36 ` [patch 10/11] x86: nmi_32/64.c - add helper functions to hide mode-specific data Cyrill Gorcunov
2008-05-24 15:36 ` [patch 11/11] x86: nmi_32/64.c - merge down nmi_32.c and nmi_64.c to nmi.c Cyrill Gorcunov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20080528162527.GB6910@cvg \
--to=gorcunov@gmail.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=macro@linux-mips.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox