Re: [patch 00/15] security: pass path instead of inode to security ops

Tetsuo Handa
2008-05-30T13:38:00Z

Hello.

Miklos Szeredi wrote:
> This is based on the vfs-cleanups(*) tree + the 8 patches posted
> recently (which will be added to this tree shortly).

Patching these 15 patches fails. I think this is because the 8 patches are missing.
Can I see the 8 patches?

2 out of 4 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file include/linux/security.h.rej
2 out of 3 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file include/linux/security.h.rej
2 out of 4 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file include/linux/security.h.rej
Reversed (or previously applied) patch detected! Assume -R? [n]
Apply anyway? [n]
5 out of 5 hunks ignored -- saving rejects to file fs/namei.c.rej
1 out of 4 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file include/linux/security.h.rej
2 out of 4 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file include/linux/security.h.rej
1 out of 2 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file mm/filemap.c.rej
2 out of 4 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file include/linux/security.h.rej
2 out of 5 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file include/linux/security.h.rej
11 out of 12 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file fs/namei.c.rej
2 out of 5 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file fs/namei.c.rej
2 out of 4 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file include/linux/security.h.rej
1 out of 3 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file security/selinux/hooks.c.rej

Regards.