From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756528AbYE2Xmk (ORCPT ); Thu, 29 May 2008 19:42:40 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1753185AbYE2Xmb (ORCPT ); Thu, 29 May 2008 19:42:31 -0400 Received: from smtp1.linux-foundation.org ([140.211.169.13]:38812 "EHLO smtp1.linux-foundation.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752975AbYE2Xmb (ORCPT ); Thu, 29 May 2008 19:42:31 -0400 Date: Thu, 29 May 2008 16:36:43 -0700 From: Andrew Morton To: Michael Halcrow Cc: shaggy@us.ibm.com, sandeen@redhat.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] eCryptfs: Remove unnecessary page decrypt call Message-Id: <20080529163643.4c2620fb.akpm@linux-foundation.org> In-Reply-To: <20080529220817.GF7450@halcrowt61p.austin.ibm.com> References: <20080529220817.GF7450@halcrowt61p.austin.ibm.com> X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 2.2.4 (GTK+ 2.8.20; i486-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, 29 May 2008 17:08:17 -0500 Michael Halcrow wrote: > The page decrypt calls in ecryptfs_write() are both pointless and > buggy. buggy enough to be fixed in 2.6.26? 2.6.25.x?