From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752382AbYE2ROw (ORCPT ); Thu, 29 May 2008 13:14:52 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1756501AbYE2ROe (ORCPT ); Thu, 29 May 2008 13:14:34 -0400 Received: from ug-out-1314.google.com ([66.249.92.169]:19858 "EHLO ug-out-1314.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755985AbYE2ROd (ORCPT ); Thu, 29 May 2008 13:14:33 -0400 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=to:subject:date:user-agent:cc:references:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:message-id:from; b=pzen+u75nkeMW8JNSrok7FYR09sxZcRBUnDd8EiNsVfSepNF4aP3a5ZAutGYPezXPcqVMSEQPHpXdxL+AdTEaCVV+NBfuPrs14MmnHkFMm+aKSItUM4pSWWzUqRXwUsEJ65Okd1RwTSIesYoxn8nnyratLCqmpX0HCBijctX6Oc= To: Henrique de Moraes Holschuh Subject: Re: [PATCH 15/15] rfkill: document rw rfkill switches and clarify input subsystem interactions (v2) Date: Thu, 29 May 2008 19:19:04 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.9 Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Thomas Renninger , Dmitry Torokhov References: <1211136485-19878-1-git-send-email-hmh@hmh.eng.br> <200805291502.23726.IvDoorn@gmail.com> <20080529162625.GA3375@khazad-dum.debian.net> In-Reply-To: <20080529162625.GA3375@khazad-dum.debian.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200805291919.04384.IvDoorn@gmail.com> From: Ivo van Doorn Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thursday 29 May 2008, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote: > On Thu, 29 May 2008, Ivo van Doorn wrote: > > > This version better documents *_RFKILL_ALL. Is it good enough for an > > > ACK for patch 14 of 15? > > > > Yes, you can put my ack on patch 14. > > Thanks for the documentation update. :) > > Then, this entire batch is ready for merging. Now, if only Len would > come back from wherever he disappeared to, in order to merge the two > thinkpad-acpi patches, I could send it to netdev for merge. Actually, I believe the correct merge order would through wireless-dev, which means the patches should go to John Linville and linux-wireless in the CC. > I will at least publish the entire stack as a thinkpad-acpi pre-release > version, to get some testing on the real world with some power users. > > I am thinking about how to best handle the global states. Doing it > through the rfkill class is ready, but the result was *UGLY*. More on > this later. Ivo