Re: [PATCH 15/15] rfkill: document rw rfkill switches and clarify input subsystem interactions (v2)

[Ivo van Doorn <ivdoorn@gmail.com>]

On Thursday 29 May 2008, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> On Thu, 29 May 2008, Ivo van Doorn wrote:
> > On Thursday 29 May 2008, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> > > On Thu, 29 May 2008, Ivo van Doorn wrote:
> > > > > This version better documents *_RFKILL_ALL.  Is it good enough for an
> > > > > ACK for patch 14 of 15?
> > > > 
> > > > Yes, you can put my ack on patch 14.
> > > > Thanks for the documentation update. :)
> > > 
> > > Then, this entire batch is ready for merging.  Now, if only Len would
> > > come back from wherever he disappeared to, in order to merge the two
> > > thinkpad-acpi patches, I could send it to netdev for merge.
> > 
> > Actually,  I believe the correct merge order would through wireless-dev,
> > which means the patches should go to John Linville and linux-wireless in the CC.
> 
> Noted.  At merge time (which will be as soon as the thinkpad-acpi
> changes hit mainline), I will send them to you, John, and
> linux-wireless.
> 
> Unless you want me to send them all right now to linux-wireless to see
> if there are any comments?

Well why wait with merging it into wireless-dev until thinkpad-acpi is merged?
I don't think there are real dependencies other then the SW_RFKILL_ALL define.
Perhaps you could send the rfkill patches with SW_RADIO instead of SW_RFKILL_ALL
and make the rename after the thinkpad and rfkill series have both been merged.
That would probably be the fastest route for this patch series.

Ivo