From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1758544AbYE2Rft (ORCPT ); Thu, 29 May 2008 13:35:49 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1754746AbYE2Rfk (ORCPT ); Thu, 29 May 2008 13:35:40 -0400 Received: from ug-out-1314.google.com ([66.249.92.174]:52763 "EHLO ug-out-1314.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754366AbYE2Rfj (ORCPT ); Thu, 29 May 2008 13:35:39 -0400 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=to:subject:date:user-agent:cc:references:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:message-id:from; b=ZvUqQ/fOtYgzK1pQBlGx1FNdpP0lzy2YvsR7kvwGTsQxfY+E93zeIr1hrc5vSUa6E7a6fR1GLuytTueZYmPJ0qCCoCHQBGQQZuf+qVKTY2qZZni2hxlHbV1RuJNDlDPxGJMxzIrl5wBv6SJgL/uW/T2lBDS98BkayWqvs0VqR0I= To: Henrique de Moraes Holschuh Subject: Re: [PATCH 15/15] rfkill: document rw rfkill switches and clarify input subsystem interactions (v2) Date: Thu, 29 May 2008 19:40:09 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.9 Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Thomas Renninger , Dmitry Torokhov References: <1211136485-19878-1-git-send-email-hmh@hmh.eng.br> <200805291919.04384.IvDoorn@gmail.com> <20080529172252.GB3375@khazad-dum.debian.net> In-Reply-To: <20080529172252.GB3375@khazad-dum.debian.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200805291940.09563.IvDoorn@gmail.com> From: Ivo van Doorn Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thursday 29 May 2008, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote: > On Thu, 29 May 2008, Ivo van Doorn wrote: > > On Thursday 29 May 2008, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote: > > > On Thu, 29 May 2008, Ivo van Doorn wrote: > > > > > This version better documents *_RFKILL_ALL. Is it good enough for an > > > > > ACK for patch 14 of 15? > > > > > > > > Yes, you can put my ack on patch 14. > > > > Thanks for the documentation update. :) > > > > > > Then, this entire batch is ready for merging. Now, if only Len would > > > come back from wherever he disappeared to, in order to merge the two > > > thinkpad-acpi patches, I could send it to netdev for merge. > > > > Actually, I believe the correct merge order would through wireless-dev, > > which means the patches should go to John Linville and linux-wireless in the CC. > > Noted. At merge time (which will be as soon as the thinkpad-acpi > changes hit mainline), I will send them to you, John, and > linux-wireless. > > Unless you want me to send them all right now to linux-wireless to see > if there are any comments? Well why wait with merging it into wireless-dev until thinkpad-acpi is merged? I don't think there are real dependencies other then the SW_RFKILL_ALL define. Perhaps you could send the rfkill patches with SW_RADIO instead of SW_RFKILL_ALL and make the rename after the thinkpad and rfkill series have both been merged. That would probably be the fastest route for this patch series. Ivo