From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1757750AbYE3Bxy (ORCPT ); Thu, 29 May 2008 21:53:54 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1753398AbYE3Bxr (ORCPT ); Thu, 29 May 2008 21:53:47 -0400 Received: from netops-testserver-3-out.sgi.com ([192.48.171.28]:38729 "EHLO relay.sgi.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752532AbYE3Bxq (ORCPT ); Thu, 29 May 2008 21:53:46 -0400 Date: Thu, 29 May 2008 20:53:44 -0500 From: Paul Jackson To: miaox@cn.fujitsu.com Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, menage@google.com Subject: Re: [RFC] [PATCH 1/2] cpusets: restructure the function update_cpumask() and update_nodemask() Message-Id: <20080529205344.4ba1efdb.pj@sgi.com> In-Reply-To: <483F5DAA.5060004@cn.fujitsu.com> References: <483E564A.5050807@cn.fujitsu.com> <20080529031656.cdc38001.pj@sgi.com> <483F5DAA.5060004@cn.fujitsu.com> Organization: SGI X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 2.2.4 (GTK+ 2.12.0; i686-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Miao wrote: > I think that it is unnecessary to change cpuset_cpus_allowed_locked()'s comment > because it isn't a static function, it is a extern function Yes, you are correct. My mistake. Sorry. -- I won't rest till it's the best ... Programmer, Linux Scalability Paul Jackson 1.940.382.4214