From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1759273AbYE2V7a (ORCPT ); Thu, 29 May 2008 17:59:30 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1755217AbYE2V7V (ORCPT ); Thu, 29 May 2008 17:59:21 -0400 Received: from mx2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:52860 "EHLO mx2.suse.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753611AbYE2V7U (ORCPT ); Thu, 29 May 2008 17:59:20 -0400 Date: Thu, 29 May 2008 14:58:08 -0700 From: Greg KH To: David Brownell , Alan Stern Cc: Linus Torvalds , Andrew Morton , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-usb@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [GIT PATCH] USB fixes for 2.6.26-rc4 Message-ID: <20080529215808.GA3759@suse.de> References: <20080529212110.GA2870@suse.de> <200805291448.40075.david-b@pacbell.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200805291448.40075.david-b@pacbell.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.16 (2007-06-09) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, May 29, 2008 at 02:48:39PM -0700, David Brownell wrote: > On Thursday 29 May 2008, Greg KH wrote: > > USB: EHCI: fix performance regression > > That's not a regresssion at all! Plus, this patch shouldn't > have included the timeout change. The timeout change is why > I didn't ACK this patch... Well, I was misinformed by Alan Stern about this then, sorry for missing that you didn't ack this one (you acked the other patches in this series though.) Alan, care to make up a patch to fix this? Or should I just revert it in the tree as-is? thanks, greg k-h