From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756715AbYE3QH2 (ORCPT ); Fri, 30 May 2008 12:07:28 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1753092AbYE3QHU (ORCPT ); Fri, 30 May 2008 12:07:20 -0400 Received: from relay2.sgi.com ([192.48.171.30]:40342 "EHLO relay.sgi.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752060AbYE3QHT (ORCPT ); Fri, 30 May 2008 12:07:19 -0400 Date: Fri, 30 May 2008 11:07:16 -0500 From: Paul Jackson To: Randy Dunlap Cc: miaox@cn.fujitsu.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, menage@google.com Subject: Re: [RFC] [PATCH 1/2] cpusets: restructure the function update_cpumask() and update_nodemask() Message-Id: <20080530110716.48ae6eb9.pj@sgi.com> In-Reply-To: <20080530083920.cc7a029f.rdunlap@xenotime.net> References: <483E564A.5050807@cn.fujitsu.com> <20080529031656.cdc38001.pj@sgi.com> <483F5DAA.5060004@cn.fujitsu.com> <20080529205344.4ba1efdb.pj@sgi.com> <483F6367.1040701@cn.fujitsu.com> <20080529212211.0e794c81.pj@sgi.com> <20080529203042.19f76f09.rdunlap@xenotime.net> <20080529225708.74f65654.pj@sgi.com> <20080529212746.2d9cae24.rdunlap@xenotime.net> <20080530012537.87454a8d.pj@sgi.com> <20080530083920.cc7a029f.rdunlap@xenotime.net> Organization: SGI X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 2.2.4 (GTK+ 2.12.0; i686-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Randy wrote: > Well, that's some reason for your decision. yeah ... ;). > I agree with Alan, of course. So be it ... more kernel-doc comments are good, static or not. -- I won't rest till it's the best ... Programmer, Linux Scalability Paul Jackson 1.940.382.4214