From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753457AbYEaKTR (ORCPT ); Sat, 31 May 2008 06:19:17 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751813AbYEaKS7 (ORCPT ); Sat, 31 May 2008 06:18:59 -0400 Received: from mx2.mail.elte.hu ([157.181.151.9]:37958 "EHLO mx2.mail.elte.hu" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751716AbYEaKS6 (ORCPT ); Sat, 31 May 2008 06:18:58 -0400 Date: Sat, 31 May 2008 12:18:32 +0200 From: Ingo Molnar To: "Maciej W. Rozycki" Cc: Thomas Gleixner , "H. Peter Anvin" , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 8/8] x86: I/O APIC: Timer through 8259A second-chance Message-ID: <20080531101832.GA15170@elte.hu> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) X-ELTE-VirusStatus: clean X-ELTE-SpamScore: -1.5 X-ELTE-SpamLevel: X-ELTE-SpamCheck: no X-ELTE-SpamVersion: ELTE 2.0 X-ELTE-SpamCheck-Details: score=-1.5 required=5.9 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no SpamAssassin version=3.2.3 -1.5 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0050] Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org * Maciej W. Rozycki wrote: > Despite looking quite innocent, this is the most intrusive > modification in the series. I tested this change (on top of all the > other 14 ones) with as many variations of interrupt wiring > configuration as I could imagine and simulate with my system. Of > course my machine is perfectly unbroken, :) so chances are more exotic > convolutions may have escaped my attention. Also I tested the 32-bit > variation only. So again, I recommend a good amount of testing in the > field before this patch is propagated upstream. applied all 15 APIC patches of yours to tip/x86/apic, thanks Maciej! Ingo