public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
To: Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Paul Fulghum <paulkf@microgate.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] Char: tty_io, fix closecount counting
Date: Sat, 31 May 2008 14:43:45 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080531144345.0a2f3c11@core> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <48413B6E.3050202@gmail.com>

> It is ever vcs1, which is /dev/console and it is the only treated separately 
> (otherwise I think we would have more (and distinct) reports like this). 
> When the console is HUPped? And what should happen with openers? The 
> 2.6.22+suse happened when sulogin /dev/console was invoked. Any ideas how to 
> track this down?

Its a complete and total mess is the obvious answer. In fact its far
worse than it first looks and I don't believe it can be fixed without
reworking the whole printk/console stuff.

I spent several days this week mapping out how the tty open/close/hangup
logic works and to be honest what I've learned is

- It doesn't
- It can't be easily fixed to
- There are numerous races
- The whole "tty/console" abstraction for printk type stuff is totally
broken by design and replicated in several places for good measure.

At this point I have to say I can't even see a way to get from the
existing tty open/close/hangup logic to a working one which does not
involve changes to every driver with a 'flag day' type switch between the
two implementations.

For the existing codebase I think the best we can do in this area is label
it "condemned" and not touch it, because any change will be unpredictable
in its effect and not a real fix.

I'd love to be proved wrong. Doing a grand reimplementation of large
chunks of the tty layer isn't what I want to do, I just see no
alternative at this point.

Alan

  parent reply	other threads:[~2008-05-31 13:58 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-05-26 14:08 [PATCH 1/1] Char: tty_io, fix closecount counting Jiri Slaby
2008-05-26 15:22 ` Jiri Slaby
2008-05-31 11:50 ` Jiri Slaby
2008-05-31 11:51   ` Jiri Slaby
2008-05-31 13:43   ` Alan Cox [this message]
2008-06-03 20:46     ` Jiri Slaby

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20080531144345.0a2f3c11@core \
    --to=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
    --cc=jirislaby@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=paulkf@microgate.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox