public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Nick Andrew <nick@nick-andrew.net>
To: Jesper Juhl <jesper.juhl@gmail.com>
Cc: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>,
	Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@gmail.com>,
	rdunlap@xenotime.net, tytso@mit.edu, hch@infradead.org,
	viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	davem@davemloft.net, Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: CFD: linux-wanking@vger.kernel.org (was [PATCH] Standard	indentation of arguments)
Date: Sun, 1 Jun 2008 02:23:13 +1000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080531162312.GA5599@tull.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <9a8748490805211646s5ef93f8ey43ebbc7746fb1a3b@mail.gmail.com>

Suggestions ...

On Thu, May 22, 2008 at 01:46:28AM +0200, Jesper Juhl wrote:
> Ok, here's a first (very) rough draft of a KernelNewbieGuide document.
> It can certainly be expanded a lot and my grammar and spelling is far
> from perfect, but hey, it's a first rough draft :)

[...]

> - Go through the kernel Bugzilla (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/) and see
> if you can fix any of the many bugs filed in it. There's a metric
> butload of bugs filed in there that need attention.

"buttload"

> As far as tools go, all you really need are the tools compile the
> kernel (gcc, make etc) and a text editor to edit the source - vi,
> emacs, joe, almost anything will do fine.

"tools _to_ compile the kernel"

> Developing against anything older than the latest stable kernel is
> likely to be a waste of effort due to the rapid pace of
> development. Once you finish your patch against a several months (or
> even weeks) old kernel, your patch runs a great risk of being obsolete
> or impossible to apply (this greatly depends on the area you work on
> ofcours cince some areas change more rapidly than others, but do try

"of course, since"

> If your patch did not get applied and you recieved an ACK or some

"received"

> criticism about your patch, then your job is easy. If there's a very
> explicit rejection of the patch by the maintainer of the code with a
> good reason, then don't bother sending it again, it probably will
> never be applied. If the patch received improvement suggestions or
> other review comments, then you should create a new version of your
> patch that adresses the feedback you get and then re-submit (it's
> usually a good idea to list what stuff you've adressed when
> re-submitting).

"addressed".

I'd probably make a few grammatical changes too. When you're happy
with the content and your document is in the tree, I'll submit a
patch :-)

Nick.
-- 
PGP Key ID = 0x418487E7                      http://www.nick-andrew.net/
PGP Key fingerprint = B3ED 6894 8E49 1770 C24A  67E3 6266 6EB9 4184 87E7

  parent reply	other threads:[~2008-05-31 16:23 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 56+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-05-21  5:58 [PATCH] Standard indentation of arguments Jianjun Kong
2008-05-21  7:19 ` Jiri Slaby
2008-05-21 11:35   ` David Newall
2008-05-21  8:34 ` CFD: linux-wanking@vger.kernel.org (was [PATCH] Standard indentation of arguments) Al Viro
2008-05-21  8:50   ` Andrew Morton
2008-05-21  9:19     ` CFD: linux-wanking@vger.kernel.org David Miller
2008-05-21  9:41     ` CFD: linux-wanking@vger.kernel.org (was [PATCH] Standard indentation of arguments) Al Viro
2008-05-21 17:44       ` Andrew Morton
2008-05-21 19:45         ` Theodore Tso
2008-05-21 20:38           ` Rene Herman
2008-05-21 20:50             ` Andrew Morton
2008-05-21 21:08               ` Rene Herman
2008-05-21 21:12                 ` Andrew Morton
2008-05-21 21:32                   ` Rene Herman
2008-05-22 19:40           ` Jaya Kumar
2008-05-21 10:32     ` Christoph Hellwig
2008-05-21 12:09       ` Theodore Tso
2008-05-21 17:46         ` Andrew Morton
2008-05-21 18:57           ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2008-05-21 19:31             ` Andrew Morton
2008-05-21 20:10               ` CFD: linux-wanking@vger.kernel.org David Miller
2008-05-21 21:25                 ` Willy Tarreau
2008-05-21 21:44                   ` Stefan Richter
2008-05-21 21:56                     ` Willy Tarreau
2008-05-21 21:08               ` CFD: linux-wanking@vger.kernel.org (was [PATCH] Standard indentation of arguments) Valdis.Kletnieks
2008-05-21 23:01               ` Adrian Bunk
2008-05-21 23:17                 ` Rene Herman
2008-05-21 23:55                   ` Adrian Bunk
2008-05-22  0:10                     ` Rene Herman
2008-05-22 14:31                       ` Adrian Bunk
2008-05-21 23:35                 ` Al Viro
2008-05-22  0:38                   ` Adrian Bunk
2008-05-22  1:05                     ` Alan Cox
2008-05-22 16:08                 ` Stefan Richter
2008-05-21 19:33             ` Randy Dunlap
2008-05-21 19:45               ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2008-05-21 19:54                 ` Andrew Morton
2008-05-21 20:06                   ` Jesper Juhl
2008-05-21 20:27                     ` CFD: linux-wanking@vger.kernel.org (was [PATCH] Standard indentation of arguments), " Jonathan Corbet
2008-05-21 20:37                       ` Jesper Juhl
2008-05-21 23:46                         ` Jesper Juhl
2008-05-22  0:12                           ` Adrian Bunk
2008-05-22  0:32                             ` Jesper Juhl
2008-05-22  1:03                             ` Alan Cox
2008-05-22 14:56                             ` Pavel Machek
2008-05-22 15:29                             ` Arjan van de Ven
2008-05-22  0:14                           ` Al Viro
2008-05-22  0:34                             ` Jesper Juhl
2008-05-22  1:07                           ` Johannes Weiner
2008-05-22  4:51                           ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2008-05-22  5:34                           ` david
2008-05-31 16:23                           ` Nick Andrew [this message]
2008-05-21 19:42             ` Johannes Weiner
2008-05-21 19:47               ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2008-05-21 19:49           ` CFD: linux-wanking@vger.kernel.org David Miller
2008-05-21 22:03             ` Al Viro

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20080531162312.GA5599@tull.net \
    --to=nick@nick-andrew.net \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=corbet@lwn.net \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=gorcunov@gmail.com \
    --cc=hch@infradead.org \
    --cc=jesper.juhl@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rdunlap@xenotime.net \
    --cc=tytso@mit.edu \
    --cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox