From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
To: David Newall <davidn@davidnewall.com>
Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, hch@lst.de
Subject: Re: [RFC 0/7] [RFC] cramfs: fake write support
Date: Sat, 31 May 2008 22:40:50 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200805312240.50720.arnd@arndb.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <48419F45.20908@davidnewall.com>
On Saturday 31 May 2008, David Newall wrote:
> I don't agree that it is nicer to do this in cramfs. I prefer the
> technique of union of a tmpfs over some other fs because a single
> solution that works with all filesystems is better than re-implementing
> the same idea in multiple filesystems. Multiple implementations is a
> recipe for bugs and feature mismatch.
You're right in principle, but unfortunately there is to date no working
implementation of union mounts. Giving users the option of using an
existing file system with a few tweaks can only be better than than
forcing them to use hacks like unionfs.
Arnd <><
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-05-31 20:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-05-31 15:37 [RFC 0/7] [RFC] cramfs: fake write support arnd
2008-05-31 18:56 ` David Newall
2008-05-31 20:40 ` Arnd Bergmann [this message]
2008-06-01 3:54 ` Phillip Lougher
2008-06-01 8:52 ` Arnd Bergmann
2008-06-01 12:28 ` Jamie Lokier
2008-06-01 21:49 ` Arnd Bergmann
2008-06-02 2:48 ` hooanon05
2008-06-02 3:25 ` Erez Zadok
2008-06-02 7:51 ` Arnd Bergmann
2008-06-02 18:13 ` Erez Zadok
2008-06-03 2:02 ` Phillip Lougher
2008-06-02 3:51 ` Erez Zadok
2008-06-02 11:07 ` Jamie Lokier
2008-06-02 4:37 ` Erez Zadok
2008-06-02 6:07 ` Bharata B Rao
2008-06-02 7:17 ` Jan Engelhardt
2008-06-02 7:12 ` Arnd Bergmann
2008-06-02 10:36 ` hooanon05
2008-06-02 11:15 ` Arnd Bergmann
2008-06-02 12:56 ` hooanon05
2008-06-02 14:13 ` Arnd Bergmann
2008-06-02 14:33 ` hooanon05
2008-06-02 15:01 ` Arnd Bergmann
2008-06-03 11:04 ` hooanon05
2008-06-02 14:54 ` Evgeniy Polyakov
2008-06-02 17:42 ` Arnd Bergmann
2008-06-02 15:35 ` Erez Zadok
2008-06-01 6:02 ` David Newall
2008-06-01 9:11 ` Jan Engelhardt
2008-06-01 16:25 ` Jörn Engel
2008-06-01 3:19 ` Phillip Lougher
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200805312240.50720.arnd@arndb.de \
--to=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=davidn@davidnewall.com \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox