From: Pavel Machek <pavel@suse.cz>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>, mtk.manpages@gmail.com
Cc: Hugh Dickins <hugh@veritas.com>,
kernel list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>
Subject: Re: sync_file_range(SYNC_FILE_RANGE_WRITE) blocks?
Date: Sun, 1 Jun 2008 13:40:09 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080601114008.GC16843@elf.ucw.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080601011501.199af80c.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Hi!
> > > > All I can say so far is that I find the same as you do:
> > > > SYNC_FILE_RANGE_WRITE (after writing) takes a significant amount of time,
> > > > more than half as long as when you add in SYNC_FILE_RANGE_WAIT_AFTER too.
> > > >
> > > > Which make the sync_file_range call pretty pointless: your usage seems
> > > > perfectly reasonable to me, but somehow we've broken its behaviour.
> > > > I'll be investigating ...
> > >
> > > It will block on disk queue fullness - sysrq-W will tell.
> >
> > Ah, thank you. What a disappointment, though it's understandable.
> > Doesn't that very severely limit the usefulness of the system call?
>
> A bit. The request queue size is runtime tunable though.
Which /sys is that? What happens if I set the queue size to pretty
much infinity, will memory management die horribly?
> I expect major users of this system call will be applications which do
> small-sized overwrites into large files, mainly databases. That is,
> once the application developers discover its existence. I'm still
> getting expressions of wonder from people who I tell about the
> five-year-old fadvise().
Hey, you have one user now, its called s2disk. But for this call to be
useful, we'd need asynchronous variant... is there such thing?
Okay, I can fork and do the call from another process, but...
> > I admit the flag isn't called SYNC_FILE_RANGE_WRITE_WITHOUT_WAITING,
> > but I don't suppose Pavel and I are the only ones misled by it.
>
> Yup, this caveat/restriction should be in the manpage.
Michael, this is something for you I guess?
And andrew, something for you:
---
SYNC_FILE_RANGE_WRITE may and will block. Document that.
Signed-off-by: Pavel Machek <pavel@suse.cz>
---
commit 5db78da3d8e6fa527bfe384ded2ff7c835592fe2
tree 4c405e07be12f0a2260492fb43d19802ff7ebab1
parent 0ea376de01be797f9563c2c2464149f8f0af6329
author Pavel <pavel@amd.ucw.cz> Sun, 01 Jun 2008 13:39:25 +0200
committer Pavel <pavel@amd.ucw.cz> Sun, 01 Jun 2008 13:39:25 +0200
fs/sync.c | 3 ++-
1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/sync.c b/fs/sync.c
index 228e17b..54e9f20 100644
--- a/fs/sync.c
+++ b/fs/sync.c
@@ -139,7 +139,8 @@ asmlinkage long sys_fdatasync(unsigned i
* before performing the write.
*
* SYNC_FILE_RANGE_WRITE: initiate writeout of all those dirty pages in the
- * range which are not presently under writeback.
+ * range which are not presently under writeback. Notice that even this this
+ * may and will block if you attempt to write more than request queue size.
*
* SYNC_FILE_RANGE_WAIT_AFTER: wait upon writeout of all pages in the range
* after performing the write.
--
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-06-01 11:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-05-30 10:26 sync_file_range(SYNC_FILE_RANGE_WRITE) blocks? Pavel Machek
2008-05-30 13:58 ` Hugh Dickins
2008-05-30 20:43 ` Pavel Machek
2008-05-31 18:44 ` Hugh Dickins
2008-06-01 0:39 ` Andrew Morton
2008-06-01 7:23 ` Hugh Dickins
2008-06-01 8:15 ` Andrew Morton
2008-06-01 11:40 ` Pavel Machek [this message]
2008-06-01 20:37 ` Andrew Morton
2008-06-01 22:00 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-06-01 22:22 ` Pavel Machek
2008-06-01 22:47 ` Andrew Morton
2008-06-01 23:00 ` Pavel Machek
2008-06-01 23:11 ` Andrew Morton
2008-06-02 8:43 ` Hugh Dickins
2008-06-02 11:18 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-06-02 12:11 ` Hugh Dickins
2008-06-02 11:43 ` Jens Axboe
2008-06-02 12:40 ` Hugh Dickins
2008-06-16 20:53 ` Rik van Riel
2008-06-17 4:54 ` Andrew Morton
2008-06-17 13:38 ` Rik van Riel
2008-06-02 16:50 ` Andrew Morton
2008-06-03 8:01 ` Michael Kerrisk
2008-06-03 8:05 ` Pavel Machek
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20080601114008.GC16843@elf.ucw.cz \
--to=pavel@suse.cz \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=hugh@veritas.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mtk.manpages@gmail.com \
--cc=rjw@sisk.pl \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox