From: Dimitri Sivanich <sivanich@sgi.com>
To: Max Krasnyansky <maxk@qualcomm.com>
Cc: Paul Jackson <pj@sgi.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Con Kolivas <kernel@kolivas.org>,
"Derek L. Fults" <dfults@sgi.com>, devik <devik@cdi.cz>,
Dinakar Guniguntala <dino@in.ibm.com>,
Emmanuel Pacaud <emmanuel.pacaud@univ-poitiers.fr>,
Frederik Deweerdt <deweerdt@free.fr>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
Matthew Dobson <colpatch@us.ibm.com>,
Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au>,
rostedt@goodmis.org, Oleg Nesterov <oleg@tv-sign.ru>,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@us.ibm.com>,
Paul Menage <menage@google.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>,
"Randy.Dunlap" <rddunlap@osdl.org>,
suresh.b.siddha@intel.com, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Subject: Re: Inquiry: Should we remove "isolcpus= kernel boot option? (may have realtime uses)
Date: Tue, 3 Jun 2008 09:40:10 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080603144010.GA25948@sgi.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <48446D46.2010903@qualcomm.com>
On Mon, Jun 02, 2008 at 02:59:34PM -0700, Max Krasnyansky wrote:
> Yes it used to be somewhat unstable. These days it solid. I'm using it on a
> wide range of systems: uTCA Core2Duo, NUMA dual-Opteron, 8way Core2, etc. And
> things work as expected.
Max,
I tried the following scenario on an ia64 Altix running 2.6.26-rc4 with cpusets compiled in but cpuset fs unmounted. Do your patches already address this?
$ taskset -cp 3 $$ (attach to cpu 3)
pid 4591's current affinity list: 0-3
pid 4591's new affinity list: 3
$ echo 0 > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu2/online (down cpu 2)
(above command hangs)
Backtrace of pid 4591 (bash)
Call Trace:
[<a00000010078e990>] schedule+0x1210/0x13c0
sp=e0000060b6dffc90 bsp=e0000060b6df11e0
[<a00000010078ef60>] schedule_timeout+0x40/0x180
sp=e0000060b6dffce0 bsp=e0000060b6df11b0
[<a00000010078d3e0>] wait_for_common+0x240/0x3c0
sp=e0000060b6dffd10 bsp=e0000060b6df1180
[<a00000010078d760>] wait_for_completion+0x40/0x60
sp=e0000060b6dffd40 bsp=e0000060b6df1160
[<a000000100114ee0>] __stop_machine_run+0x120/0x160
sp=e0000060b6dffd40 bsp=e0000060b6df1120
[<a000000100765ae0>] _cpu_down+0x2a0/0x600
sp=e0000060b6dffd80 bsp=e0000060b6df10c8
[<a000000100765ea0>] cpu_down+0x60/0xa0
sp=e0000060b6dffe20 bsp=e0000060b6df10a0
[<a000000100768090>] store_online+0x50/0xe0
sp=e0000060b6dffe20 bsp=e0000060b6df1070
[<a0000001004f8800>] sysdev_store+0x60/0xa0
sp=e0000060b6dffe20 bsp=e0000060b6df1038
[<a00000010022e370>] sysfs_write_file+0x250/0x300
sp=e0000060b6dffe20 bsp=e0000060b6df0fe0
[<a00000010018a750>] vfs_write+0x1b0/0x300
sp=e0000060b6dffe20 bsp=e0000060b6df0f90
[<a00000010018b350>] sys_write+0x70/0xe0
sp=e0000060b6dffe20 bsp=e0000060b6df0f18
[<a00000010000af80>] ia64_ret_from_syscall+0x0/0x20
sp=e0000060b6dffe30 bsp=e0000060b6df0f18
[<a000000000010720>] ia64_ivt+0xffffffff00010720/0x400
sp=e0000060b6e00000 bsp=e0000060b6df0f18
I also got this to hang after doing this:
- taskset -cp 3 $$ (attach to cpu 3)
- echo 0 > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu2/online (down cpu 2, successful this time)
- echo 1 > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu2/online (up cpu 2, successful)
- taskset -p $$ (read cpumask, this command hangs)
Traceback here was:
Backtrace of pid 4653 (bash)
Call Trace:
[<a00000010078e990>] schedule+0x1210/0x13c0
sp=e0000060b78afab0 bsp=e0000060b78a1320
[<a00000010078ef60>] schedule_timeout+0x40/0x180
sp=e0000060b78afb00 bsp=e0000060b78a12f0
[<a00000010078d3e0>] wait_for_common+0x240/0x3c0
sp=e0000060b78afb30 bsp=e0000060b78a12c0
[<a00000010078d760>] wait_for_completion+0x40/0x60
sp=e0000060b78afb60 bsp=e0000060b78a12a0
[<a0000001000a63b0>] set_cpus_allowed_ptr+0x210/0x2a0
sp=e0000060b78afb60 bsp=e0000060b78a1270
[<a000000100786930>] cache_add_dev+0x970/0xbc0
sp=e0000060b78afbb0 bsp=e0000060b78a11d0
[<a000000100786c20>] cache_cpu_callback+0xa0/0x1e0
sp=e0000060b78afe10 bsp=e0000060b78a1190
[<a0000001000e96b0>] notifier_call_chain+0x50/0xe0
sp=e0000060b78afe10 bsp=e0000060b78a1148
[<a0000001000e9900>] __raw_notifier_call_chain+0x40/0x60
sp=e0000060b78afe10 bsp=e0000060b78a1108
[<a0000001000e9960>] raw_notifier_call_chain+0x40/0x60
sp=e0000060b78afe10 bsp=e0000060b78a10d8
[<a00000010078ba70>] cpu_up+0x2d0/0x380
sp=e0000060b78afe10 bsp=e0000060b78a10a0
[<a0000001007680b0>] store_online+0x70/0xe0
sp=e0000060b78afe20 bsp=e0000060b78a1070
[<a0000001004f8800>] sysdev_store+0x60/0xa0
sp=e0000060b78afe20 bsp=e0000060b78a1038
[<a00000010022e370>] sysfs_write_file+0x250/0x300
sp=e0000060b78afe20 bsp=e0000060b78a0fe0
[<a00000010018a750>] vfs_write+0x1b0/0x300
sp=e0000060b78afe20 bsp=e0000060b78a0f90
[<a00000010018b350>] sys_write+0x70/0xe0
sp=e0000060b78afe20 bsp=e0000060b78a0f18
[<a00000010000af80>] ia64_ret_from_syscall+0x0/0x20
sp=e0000060b78afe30 bsp=e0000060b78a0f18
[<a000000000010720>] ia64_ivt+0xffffffff00010720/0x400
sp=e0000060b78b0000 bsp=e0000060b78a0f18
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-06-03 14:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 60+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-06-02 2:30 Inquiry: Should we remove "isolcpus= kernel boot option? (may have realtime uses) Paul Jackson
2008-06-02 16:42 ` Dimitri Sivanich
2008-06-02 18:39 ` Max Krasnyansky
2008-06-02 21:41 ` Dimitri Sivanich
2008-06-02 21:59 ` Max Krasnyansky
2008-06-03 14:40 ` Dimitri Sivanich [this message]
2008-06-03 17:57 ` Max Krasnyanskiy
2008-06-04 14:00 ` Dimitri Sivanich
2008-06-04 18:07 ` Stop machine threads are getting preemted by the rt period enforcement Max Krasnyansky
2008-06-04 18:18 ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-06-04 18:24 ` Max Krasnyansky
2008-06-04 18:55 ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-06-04 20:14 ` Max Krasnyansky
2008-06-02 22:35 ` Inquiry: Should we remove "isolcpus= kernel boot option? (may have realtime uses) Ingo Oeser
2008-06-02 22:45 ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-06-02 23:04 ` Max Krasnyansky
2008-06-02 23:55 ` Ingo Oeser
2008-06-03 3:32 ` Max Krasnyansky
2008-06-03 23:47 ` Max Krasnyanskiy
2008-06-04 0:41 ` Paul Jackson
2008-06-04 4:32 ` Max Krasnyansky
2008-06-04 4:47 ` Paul Jackson
2008-06-04 12:18 ` Andi Kleen
2008-06-04 17:41 ` Paul Jackson
2008-06-04 18:29 ` Max Krasnyansky
2008-06-04 18:56 ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-06-04 19:34 ` Max Krasnyansky
2008-06-04 18:58 ` Paul Jackson
2008-06-04 19:31 ` Max Krasnyansky
2008-06-04 19:37 ` Paul Jackson
2008-06-04 19:45 ` Max Krasnyansky
2008-06-04 20:05 ` Andi Kleen
2008-06-04 20:23 ` Paul Jackson
2008-06-04 20:03 ` Andi Kleen
2008-06-04 20:16 ` Paul Jackson
2008-06-04 20:33 ` Andi Kleen
2008-06-04 20:38 ` Paul Jackson
2008-06-04 21:16 ` Max Krasnyansky
2008-06-04 21:17 ` Paul Jackson
2008-06-04 21:20 ` Max Krasnyansky
2008-06-04 21:26 ` Paul Jackson
2008-06-04 1:18 ` Nick Piggin
2008-06-04 3:00 ` Max Krasnyansky
2008-06-04 16:18 ` Ingo Oeser
2008-06-04 17:47 ` Max Krasnyansky
2008-06-03 6:03 ` Nick Piggin
2008-06-04 9:58 ` Mark Hounschell
2008-06-04 17:26 ` Paul Jackson
2008-06-04 21:00 ` Mark Hounschell
2008-06-04 21:03 ` Paul Jackson
2008-06-04 19:26 ` Max Krasnyansky
2008-06-04 20:25 ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-06-04 21:44 ` Michael Trimarchi
2008-06-04 21:52 ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-06-05 11:16 ` Michael Trimarchi
2008-06-05 12:07 ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-06-05 14:57 ` Michael Trimarchi
2009-05-08 2:48 ` GeunSik Lim
2008-06-05 11:44 ` Mark Hounschell
2008-06-06 22:28 ` Max Krasnyanskiy
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20080603144010.GA25948@sgi.com \
--to=sivanich@sgi.com \
--cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
--cc=colpatch@us.ibm.com \
--cc=devik@cdi.cz \
--cc=deweerdt@free.fr \
--cc=dfults@sgi.com \
--cc=dino@in.ibm.com \
--cc=emmanuel.pacaud@univ-poitiers.fr \
--cc=kernel@kolivas.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=maxk@qualcomm.com \
--cc=menage@google.com \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au \
--cc=oleg@tv-sign.ru \
--cc=paulmck@us.ibm.com \
--cc=pj@sgi.com \
--cc=rddunlap@osdl.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=suresh.b.siddha@intel.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox