* [PATCH 5/6] UML - stub needs to tolerate SIGWINCH
@ 2008-06-03 19:02 Jeff Dike
0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: Jeff Dike @ 2008-06-03 19:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Andrew Morton, LKML, uml-devel; +Cc: Benedict Verheyen
We lost the marking of SIGWINCH as being OK to receive during stub
execution, causing a panic should that happen.
Cc: Benedict Verheyen <benedict.verheyen@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Jeff Dike <jdike@linux.intel.com>
---
arch/um/os-Linux/skas/process.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
Index: linux-2.6.22/arch/um/os-Linux/skas/process.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.22.orig/arch/um/os-Linux/skas/process.c 2008-04-14 10:44:33.000000000 -0400
+++ linux-2.6.22/arch/um/os-Linux/skas/process.c 2008-05-13 11:37:35.000000000 -0400
@@ -55,7 +55,7 @@ static int ptrace_dump_regs(int pid)
* Signals that are OK to receive in the stub - we'll just continue it.
* SIGWINCH will happen when UML is inside a detached screen.
*/
-#define STUB_SIG_MASK (1 << SIGVTALRM)
+#define STUB_SIG_MASK ((1 << SIGVTALRM) | (1 << SIGWINCH))
/* Signals that the stub will finish with - anything else is an error */
#define STUB_DONE_MASK (1 << SIGTRAP)
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] only message in thread
only message in thread, other threads:[~2008-06-03 19:04 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: (only message) (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2008-06-03 19:02 [PATCH 5/6] UML - stub needs to tolerate SIGWINCH Jeff Dike
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox