public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Pavel Machek <pavel@suse.cz>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>
Cc: Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, akpm@osdl.org,
	pm list <linux-pm@lists.linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH] snapshot: Use pm_mutex for mutual exclusion
Date: Wed, 4 Jun 2008 00:20:05 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080603222005.GA10929@elf.ucw.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200806022333.56939.rjw@sisk.pl>

Hi!

> Appended is what I think we can do.

Looks ok to me. ACK.
								Pavel
> ---
> We can avoid taking the BKL in snapshot_ioctl() if pm_mutex is used to prevent
> the ioctls from being executed concurrently.
> 
> In addition, although it is only possible to open /dev/snapshot once, the task
> which has done that may spawn a child that will inherit the open descriptor,
> so in theory they can call snapshot_write(), snapshot_read() and
> snapshot_release() concurrently.  pm_mutex can also be used for mutual
> exclusion in such cases.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
> ---
>  kernel/power/user.c |   68 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------------
>  1 file changed, 42 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-)
> 
> Index: linux-2.6/kernel/power/user.c
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-2.6.orig/kernel/power/user.c
> +++ linux-2.6/kernel/power/user.c
> @@ -70,16 +70,22 @@ static int snapshot_open(struct inode *i
>  	struct snapshot_data *data;
>  	int error;
>  
> -	if (!atomic_add_unless(&snapshot_device_available, -1, 0))
> -		return -EBUSY;
> +	mutex_lock(&pm_mutex);
> +
> +	if (!atomic_add_unless(&snapshot_device_available, -1, 0)) {
> +		error = -EBUSY;
> +		goto Unlock;
> +	}
>  
>  	if ((filp->f_flags & O_ACCMODE) == O_RDWR) {
>  		atomic_inc(&snapshot_device_available);
> -		return -ENOSYS;
> +		error = -ENOSYS;
> +		goto Unlock;
>  	}
>  	if(create_basic_memory_bitmaps()) {
>  		atomic_inc(&snapshot_device_available);
> -		return -ENOMEM;
> +		error = -ENOMEM;
> +		goto Unlock;
>  	}
>  	nonseekable_open(inode, filp);
>  	data = &snapshot_state;
> @@ -99,33 +105,36 @@ static int snapshot_open(struct inode *i
>  		if (error)
>  			pm_notifier_call_chain(PM_POST_HIBERNATION);
>  	}
> -	if (error) {
> +	if (error)
>  		atomic_inc(&snapshot_device_available);
> -		return error;
> -	}
>  	data->frozen = 0;
>  	data->ready = 0;
>  	data->platform_support = 0;
>  
> -	return 0;
> + Unlock:
> +	mutex_unlock(&pm_mutex);
> +
> +	return error;
>  }
>  
>  static int snapshot_release(struct inode *inode, struct file *filp)
>  {
>  	struct snapshot_data *data;
>  
> +	mutex_lock(&pm_mutex);
> +
>  	swsusp_free();
>  	free_basic_memory_bitmaps();
>  	data = filp->private_data;
>  	free_all_swap_pages(data->swap);
> -	if (data->frozen) {
> -		mutex_lock(&pm_mutex);
> +	if (data->frozen)
>  		thaw_processes();
> -		mutex_unlock(&pm_mutex);
> -	}
>  	pm_notifier_call_chain(data->mode == O_WRONLY ?
>  			PM_POST_HIBERNATION : PM_POST_RESTORE);
>  	atomic_inc(&snapshot_device_available);
> +
> +	mutex_unlock(&pm_mutex);
> +
>  	return 0;
>  }
>  
> @@ -135,9 +144,13 @@ static ssize_t snapshot_read(struct file
>  	struct snapshot_data *data;
>  	ssize_t res;
>  
> +	mutex_lock(&pm_mutex);
> +
>  	data = filp->private_data;
> -	if (!data->ready)
> -		return -ENODATA;
> +	if (!data->ready) {
> +		res = -ENODATA;
> +		goto Unlock;
> +	}
>  	res = snapshot_read_next(&data->handle, count);
>  	if (res > 0) {
>  		if (copy_to_user(buf, data_of(data->handle), res))
> @@ -145,6 +158,10 @@ static ssize_t snapshot_read(struct file
>  		else
>  			*offp = data->handle.offset;
>  	}
> +
> + Unlock:
> +	mutex_unlock(&pm_mutex);
> +
>  	return res;
>  }
>  
> @@ -154,6 +171,8 @@ static ssize_t snapshot_write(struct fil
>  	struct snapshot_data *data;
>  	ssize_t res;
>  
> +	mutex_lock(&pm_mutex);
> +
>  	data = filp->private_data;
>  	res = snapshot_write_next(&data->handle, count);
>  	if (res > 0) {
> @@ -162,6 +181,9 @@ static ssize_t snapshot_write(struct fil
>  		else
>  			*offp = data->handle.offset;
>  	}
> +
> +	mutex_unlock(&pm_mutex);
> +
>  	return res;
>  }
>  
> @@ -180,16 +202,16 @@ static long snapshot_ioctl(struct file *
>  	if (!capable(CAP_SYS_ADMIN))
>  		return -EPERM;
>  
> -	data = filp->private_data;
> +	if (!mutex_trylock(&pm_mutex))
> +		return -EBUSY;
>  
> -	lock_kernel();
> +	data = filp->private_data;
>  
>  	switch (cmd) {
>  
>  	case SNAPSHOT_FREEZE:
>  		if (data->frozen)
>  			break;
> -		mutex_lock(&pm_mutex);
>  		printk("Syncing filesystems ... ");
>  		sys_sync();
>  		printk("done.\n");
> @@ -197,7 +219,6 @@ static long snapshot_ioctl(struct file *
>  		error = freeze_processes();
>  		if (error)
>  			thaw_processes();
> -		mutex_unlock(&pm_mutex);
>  		if (!error)
>  			data->frozen = 1;
>  		break;
> @@ -205,9 +226,7 @@ static long snapshot_ioctl(struct file *
>  	case SNAPSHOT_UNFREEZE:
>  		if (!data->frozen || data->ready)
>  			break;
> -		mutex_lock(&pm_mutex);
>  		thaw_processes();
> -		mutex_unlock(&pm_mutex);
>  		data->frozen = 0;
>  		break;
>  
> @@ -310,16 +329,11 @@ static long snapshot_ioctl(struct file *
>  			error = -EPERM;
>  			break;
>  		}
> -		if (!mutex_trylock(&pm_mutex)) {
> -			error = -EBUSY;
> -			break;
> -		}
>  		/*
>  		 * Tasks are frozen and the notifiers have been called with
>  		 * PM_HIBERNATION_PREPARE
>  		 */
>  		error = suspend_devices_and_enter(PM_SUSPEND_MEM);
> -		mutex_unlock(&pm_mutex);
>  		break;
>  
>  	case SNAPSHOT_PLATFORM_SUPPORT:
> @@ -392,7 +406,9 @@ static long snapshot_ioctl(struct file *
>  		error = -ENOTTY;
>  
>  	}
> -	unlock_kernel();
> +
> +	mutex_unlock(&pm_mutex);
> +
>  	return error;
>  }
>  

-- 
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html

      reply	other threads:[~2008-06-03 22:19 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-05-22 21:25 [PATCH] snapshot: Push BKL down into ioctl handlers Alan Cox
2008-05-23  1:09 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-05-23 11:04   ` Alan Cox
2008-05-23 11:22     ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-06-02 21:33       ` [RFC][PATCH] snapshot: Use pm_mutex for mutual exclusion Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-06-03 22:20         ` Pavel Machek [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20080603222005.GA10929@elf.ucw.cz \
    --to=pavel@suse.cz \
    --cc=akpm@osdl.org \
    --cc=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pm@lists.linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=rjw@sisk.pl \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox