public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Paul Jackson <pj@sgi.com>
To: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
Cc: menage@google.com, miaox@cn.fujitsu.com,
	akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] cpusets: update tasks' cpus_allowed and mems_allowed after CPU/NODE offline/online
Date: Wed, 4 Jun 2008 14:25:40 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080604142540.6fa2bcc3.pj@sgi.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.1.10.0806041149560.21323@chino.kir.corp.google.com>

David wrote:
> That would only identify kthreads that have been created with a subsequent 
> call to set_cpus_allowed() or kthread_bind().
> 
> The PF_CPU_BOUND change targets only the latter since there are kthreads, 
> such as kstopmachine, that can continue to manipulate their cpus_allowed 
> during their lifetime.

Would your first sentence be more clearly written as:

> That would identify both kthreads that have been created with a subsequent 
> call to set_cpus_allowed() or kthread_bind().

Or do I misunderstand?

If I am reading you correctly, then would it work to have a check in the
cpuset code (rather than in the lower set_cpus_allowed() routine),
where that check refused to move tasks out of the root cpuset if they
were (1) kernel threads (mm NULL) and (2) had cpus_allowed that were a
strict subset of the root cpusets 'cpus' (the online cpus).

-- 
                  I won't rest till it's the best ...
                  Programmer, Linux Scalability
                  Paul Jackson <pj@sgi.com> 1.940.382.4214

  reply	other threads:[~2008-06-04 19:25 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-06-04  2:05 [PATCH 2/2] cpusets: update tasks' cpus_allowed and mems_allowed after CPU/NODE offline/online Miao Xie
2008-06-04  9:30 ` Paul Menage
2008-06-04  9:58   ` Paul Menage
2008-06-04 17:22     ` Paul Jackson
2008-06-04 19:01       ` David Rientjes
2008-06-04 19:25         ` Paul Jackson [this message]
2008-06-04 19:33           ` David Rientjes
2008-06-04 19:42             ` Paul Jackson
2008-06-04 20:02               ` David Rientjes
2008-06-04 20:21                 ` Paul Jackson
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2008-06-02  8:33 Miao Xie

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20080604142540.6fa2bcc3.pj@sgi.com \
    --to=pj@sgi.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=menage@google.com \
    --cc=miaox@cn.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=rientjes@google.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox