From: Paul Jackson <pj@sgi.com>
To: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
Cc: menage@google.com, miaox@cn.fujitsu.com,
akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] cpusets: update tasks' cpus_allowed and mems_allowed after CPU/NODE offline/online
Date: Wed, 4 Jun 2008 14:25:40 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080604142540.6fa2bcc3.pj@sgi.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.1.10.0806041149560.21323@chino.kir.corp.google.com>
David wrote:
> That would only identify kthreads that have been created with a subsequent
> call to set_cpus_allowed() or kthread_bind().
>
> The PF_CPU_BOUND change targets only the latter since there are kthreads,
> such as kstopmachine, that can continue to manipulate their cpus_allowed
> during their lifetime.
Would your first sentence be more clearly written as:
> That would identify both kthreads that have been created with a subsequent
> call to set_cpus_allowed() or kthread_bind().
Or do I misunderstand?
If I am reading you correctly, then would it work to have a check in the
cpuset code (rather than in the lower set_cpus_allowed() routine),
where that check refused to move tasks out of the root cpuset if they
were (1) kernel threads (mm NULL) and (2) had cpus_allowed that were a
strict subset of the root cpusets 'cpus' (the online cpus).
--
I won't rest till it's the best ...
Programmer, Linux Scalability
Paul Jackson <pj@sgi.com> 1.940.382.4214
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-06-04 19:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-06-04 2:05 [PATCH 2/2] cpusets: update tasks' cpus_allowed and mems_allowed after CPU/NODE offline/online Miao Xie
2008-06-04 9:30 ` Paul Menage
2008-06-04 9:58 ` Paul Menage
2008-06-04 17:22 ` Paul Jackson
2008-06-04 19:01 ` David Rientjes
2008-06-04 19:25 ` Paul Jackson [this message]
2008-06-04 19:33 ` David Rientjes
2008-06-04 19:42 ` Paul Jackson
2008-06-04 20:02 ` David Rientjes
2008-06-04 20:21 ` Paul Jackson
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2008-06-02 8:33 Miao Xie
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20080604142540.6fa2bcc3.pj@sgi.com \
--to=pj@sgi.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=menage@google.com \
--cc=miaox@cn.fujitsu.com \
--cc=rientjes@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox