From: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>
To: Pierre Ossman <drzeus@drzeus.cx>
Cc: Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@atmel.com>,
Linux Kernel list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Andrew Victor <linux@maxim.org.za>, Eric BENARD <ebenard@free.fr>,
ARM Linux Mailing List <linux-arm-kernel@lists.arm.linux.org.uk>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/7] mmc: at91_mci: add multiwrite switch
Date: Mon, 9 Jun 2008 14:08:31 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080609130831.GC30971@flint.arm.linux.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080609124249.349995df@mjolnir.drzeus.cx>
On Mon, Jun 09, 2008 at 12:42:49PM +0200, Pierre Ossman wrote:
> On Sun, 1 Jun 2008 15:42:52 +0100
> Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@arm.linux.org.uk> wrote:
>
> > If Pierre wants to remove the MULTIWRITE flag, I'd like to hear his
> > solution for the pxamci driver, where the only way to ascertain how
> > many bytes were transmitted may be to walk the SG list comparing the
> > DMA pointer with what was in the hardware DMA engine at the time.
> > Maybe.
>
> You set bytes_xfered to 0. As mentioned in my previous mail, I had a
> chat with Jens about this and upper layers can only expect to get the
> lower bound in how many bytes were written. Other hardware/drivers
> already behaves like this so there is no point in crippling the MMC
> layer in an effort to give nicer guarantees.
>
> This is why I asked people to audit their drivers to make sure it's
> the lower bound that's returned, but I've not received much in the way
> of replies.
You won't do from me concerning pxamci - I don't look after it anymore
after one of my MMC cards got eaten by the misbehaving bugger. I don't
think anyone else is looking after it, so that means the driver's
effectively unmaintained.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-06-09 13:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-05-30 11:49 [PATCH 0/7] mmc: at91_mci: rework to allow better transfer Nicolas Ferre
2008-05-30 12:18 ` [PATCH 5/7] mmc: at91_mci: update bytes_xfered value once xfer done Nicolas Ferre
2008-06-01 14:44 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2008-05-30 12:26 ` [PATCH 6/7] mmc: at91_mci: add sdio irq management Nicolas Ferre
2008-05-30 12:28 ` [PATCH 7/7] mmc: at91_mci: do not read irq status twice as it will forget some errors Nicolas Ferre
2008-05-30 12:43 ` [PATCH 1/7] mmc: at91_mci: support for block size not modulo 4 Nicolas Ferre
2008-05-30 12:44 ` [PATCH 2/7] mmc: at91_mci: show timeouts Nicolas Ferre
2008-05-30 12:45 ` [PATCH 3/7] mmc: at91_mci: avoid timeouts Nicolas Ferre
2008-05-30 12:45 ` [PATCH 4/7] mmc: at91_mci: add multiwrite switch Nicolas Ferre
[not found] ` <483FED84.50100@atmel.com>
2008-05-30 12:57 ` [PATCH 1/7] mmc: at91_mci: support for block size not modulo 4 Marc Pignat
[not found] ` <483FEE58.5000500@atmel.com>
2008-06-01 14:42 ` [PATCH 4/7] mmc: at91_mci: add multiwrite switch Russell King - ARM Linux
2008-06-09 10:42 ` Pierre Ossman
2008-06-09 13:08 ` Russell King - ARM Linux [this message]
2008-06-09 13:42 ` Pierre Ossman
2008-06-09 13:53 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2008-06-09 13:58 ` Pierre Ossman
2008-06-09 10:46 ` [PATCH 0/7] mmc: at91_mci: rework to allow better transfer Pierre Ossman
2008-06-10 9:54 ` Nicolas Ferre
2008-06-14 16:28 ` Pierre Ossman
2008-06-18 10:04 ` Nicolas Ferre
2008-06-18 10:47 ` Erik Mouw
2008-06-18 11:16 ` Erik Mouw
2008-06-18 11:40 ` Hans J. Koch
2008-06-18 11:47 ` David Woodhouse
2008-06-18 13:35 ` Erik Mouw
2008-06-18 13:37 ` David Woodhouse
2008-06-18 15:17 ` Erik Mouw
2008-06-20 16:30 ` Pierre Ossman
[not found] ` <6306c640806201005n17aba42ag6f0bc344256a1ad@mail.gmail.com>
2008-06-20 17:25 ` Pierre Ossman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20080609130831.GC30971@flint.arm.linux.org.uk \
--to=linux@arm.linux.org.uk \
--cc=drzeus@drzeus.cx \
--cc=ebenard@free.fr \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.arm.linux.org.uk \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@maxim.org.za \
--cc=nicolas.ferre@atmel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox