From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1757999AbYFJHm1 (ORCPT ); Tue, 10 Jun 2008 03:42:27 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751116AbYFJHmS (ORCPT ); Tue, 10 Jun 2008 03:42:18 -0400 Received: from brick.kernel.dk ([87.55.233.238]:4231 "EHLO kernel.dk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750859AbYFJHmR (ORCPT ); Tue, 10 Jun 2008 03:42:17 -0400 Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2008 09:42:16 +0200 From: Jens Axboe To: Nick Piggin Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Linux Kernel Mailing List , =?iso-8859-1?Q?J=2EA=2E_Magall=F3n?= , James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com Subject: Re: [Bug #10614] WARNING: at include/linux/blkdev.h:431 blk_queue_init_tags+0x110/0x11f() Message-ID: <20080610074215.GC20851@kernel.dk> References: <20080610025848.GD19404@wotan.suse.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <20080610025848.GD19404@wotan.suse.de> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Jun 10 2008, Nick Piggin wrote: > On Sat, Jun 07, 2008 at 10:42:56PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report > > of recent regressions. > > > > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions > > from 2.6.25. Please verify if it still should be listed. > > > > > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10614 > > Subject : WARNING: at include/linux/blkdev.h:431 blk_queue_init_tags+0x110/0x11f() > > Submitter : J.A. Magallón > > Date : 2008-05-01 02:50 (38 days old) > > References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/4/30/614 > > Handled-By : Nick Piggin > > Jens Axboe > > Did Jens fix this up, or...? > > I don't think it was ever a problem, just a false positive by the > over eager warning code (still, obviously the warning should be > silenced). J.A., how is the latest git tree going for you? It's not a real problem, but the WARN() is annoying of course. I think James had a patch queued up for the SCSI side, apparently it's not merged yet? CC'ing James. -- Jens Axboe