From: Michael Buesch <mb@bu3sch.de>
To: "Vegard Nossum" <vegard.nossum@gmail.com>
Cc: "Miles Lane" <miles.lane@gmail.com>,
"Andrew Morton" <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
"Linux Kernel Mailing List" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-wireless <linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org>,
"FUJITA Tomonori" <fujita.tomonori@lab.ntt.co.jp>
Subject: Re: BUG: NULL pointer dereference at 00000000 -- IP: [<f8e783d5>] :b43:b43_dma_mapping_error+0x16/0x155
Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2008 16:50:26 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200806101650.27180.mb@bu3sch.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <19f34abd0806100742v176f50e8se463d2e70df44332@mail.gmail.com>
On Tuesday 10 June 2008 16:42:41 Vegard Nossum wrote:
> This change comes from
>
> commit 353c409463ecba63c3a41a992d3f5fba935eada9
> Author: FUJITA Tomonori <fujita.tomonori@lab.ntt.co.jp>
> Date: Fri May 23 19:02:30 2008 +0000
Ok, FUJITA Tomonori, please make sure a patch like the following goes
into the same trees that you submitted commit 353c409 to.
Also make sure to check b43legacy. I _guess_ you might have added
the same bug there.
Index: wireless-testing/drivers/net/wireless/b43/dma.c
===================================================================
--- wireless-testing.orig/drivers/net/wireless/b43/dma.c 2008-06-10 13:58:22.000000000 +0200
+++ wireless-testing/drivers/net/wireless/b43/dma.c 2008-06-10 16:48:53.000000000 +0200
@@ -802,6 +802,7 @@ struct b43_dmaring *b43_setup_dmaring(st
if (!ring)
goto out;
ring->type = type;
+ ring->dev = dev;
nr_slots = B43_RXRING_SLOTS;
if (for_tx)
@@ -853,7 +854,6 @@ struct b43_dmaring *b43_setup_dmaring(st
DMA_TO_DEVICE);
}
- ring->dev = dev;
ring->nr_slots = nr_slots;
ring->mmio_base = b43_dmacontroller_base(type, controller_index);
ring->index = controller_index;
> dma-mapping-add-the-device-argument-to-dma_mapping_error
>
> Add per-device dma_mapping_ops support for CONFIG_X86_64 as POWER
> architecture does:
>
> This enables us to cleanly fix the Calgary IOMMU issue that some devices
> are not behind the IOMMU (http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/5/8/423).
>
> I think that per-device dma_mapping_ops support would be also helpful for
> KVM people to support PCI passthrough but Andi thinks that this makes it
> difficult to support the PCI passthrough (see the above thread). So I
> CC'ed this to KVM camp. Comments are appreciated.
>
> A pointer to dma_mapping_ops to struct dev_archdata is added. If the
> pointer is non NULL, DMA operations in asm/dma-mapping.h use it. If it's
> NULL, the system-wide dma_ops pointer is used as before.
>
> If it's useful for KVM people, I plan to implement a mechanism to register
> a hook called when a new pci (or dma capable) device is created (it works
> with hot plugging). It enables IOMMUs to set up an appropriate
> dma_mapping_ops per device.
>
> The major obstacle is that dma_mapping_error doesn't take a pointer to the
> device unlike other DMA operations. So x86 can't have dma_mapping_ops per
> device. Note all the POWER IOMMUs use the same dma_mapping_error function
> so this is not a problem for POWER but x86 IOMMUs use different
> dma_mapping_error functions.
>
> The first patch adds the device argument to dma_mapping_error. The patch
> is trivial but large since it touches lots of drivers and dma-mapping.h in
> all the architecture.
>
> (Added to Cc.)
>
>
> Vegard
>
--
Greetings Michael.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-06-10 14:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-06-10 14:09 BUG: NULL pointer dereference at 00000000 -- IP: [<f8e783d5>] :b43:b43_dma_mapping_error+0x16/0x155 Miles Lane
2008-06-10 14:23 ` Michael Buesch
2008-06-10 14:29 ` Vegard Nossum
2008-06-10 14:34 ` Michael Buesch
2008-06-10 14:37 ` Michael Buesch
2008-06-10 14:42 ` Miles Lane
2008-06-10 15:09 ` Vegard Nossum
2008-06-10 14:42 ` Vegard Nossum
2008-06-10 14:50 ` Michael Buesch [this message]
2008-06-10 22:09 ` Miles Lane
2008-06-10 22:15 ` Michael Buesch
2008-06-10 22:29 ` Miles Lane
2008-06-10 23:15 ` Larry Finger
2008-06-11 1:57 ` Miles Lane
2008-06-11 5:08 ` Larry Finger
2008-06-11 5:57 ` Miles Lane
2008-06-12 5:18 ` FUJITA Tomonori
2008-06-11 0:58 ` FUJITA Tomonori
2008-06-11 10:05 ` Michael Buesch
2008-06-11 12:23 ` Larry Finger
2008-06-12 5:18 ` FUJITA Tomonori
2008-06-12 9:14 ` Michael Buesch
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200806101650.27180.mb@bu3sch.de \
--to=mb@bu3sch.de \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=fujita.tomonori@lab.ntt.co.jp \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=miles.lane@gmail.com \
--cc=vegard.nossum@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox