From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: FUJITA Tomonori <fujita.tomonori@lab.ntt.co.jp>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, tglx@linutronix.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH -mm] add a helper function to test if an object is on the stack
Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2008 22:52:36 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080610225236.5d698871.akpm@linux-foundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1213150485-25584-1-git-send-email-fujita.tomonori@lab.ntt.co.jp>
On Wed, 11 Jun 2008 11:14:45 +0900 FUJITA Tomonori <fujita.tomonori@lab.ntt.co.jp> wrote:
> lib/debugobjects.c has a function to test if an object is on the
> stack. The block layer and ide needs it (they need to avoid DMA
> from/to stack buffers). This patch moves the function to
> include/linux/sched.h so that everyone can use it.
>
> lib/debugobjects.c uses current->stack but this patch uses a
> task_stack_page() accessor, which is a preferable way to access to
> stack.
>
Seems reasonable.
> ---
> include/linux/sched.h | 7 +++++++
> lib/debugobjects.c | 4 +---
> 2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/sched.h b/include/linux/sched.h
> index 4efb39b..799bbdd 100644
> --- a/include/linux/sched.h
> +++ b/include/linux/sched.h
> @@ -1978,6 +1978,13 @@ static inline unsigned long *end_of_stack(struct task_struct *p)
>
> #endif
>
> +static inline int object_is_on_stack(void *obj)
> +{
> + void *stack = task_stack_page(current);
Are we sure that this will work if !defined __HAVE_THREAD_FUNCTIONS?
> + return (obj >= stack) && (obj < (stack + THREAD_SIZE));
> +}
> +
> extern void thread_info_cache_init(void);
>
> #ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_STACK_USAGE
> diff --git a/lib/debugobjects.c b/lib/debugobjects.c
> index a76a5e1..2afddde 100644
> --- a/lib/debugobjects.c
> +++ b/lib/debugobjects.c
> @@ -231,15 +231,13 @@ debug_object_fixup(int (*fixup)(void *addr, enum debug_obj_state state),
>
> static void debug_object_is_on_stack(void *addr, int onstack)
> {
> - void *stack = current->stack;
> int is_on_stack;
> static int limit;
>
> if (limit > 4)
> return;
>
> - is_on_stack = (addr >= stack && addr < (stack + THREAD_SIZE));
> -
> + is_on_stack = object_is_on_stack(addr);
> if (is_on_stack == onstack)
> return;
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-06-11 5:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-06-11 2:14 [PATCH -mm] add a helper function to test if an object is on the stack FUJITA Tomonori
2008-06-11 5:52 ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2008-06-12 5:18 ` FUJITA Tomonori
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20080610225236.5d698871.akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--to=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=fujita.tomonori@lab.ntt.co.jp \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox