From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756415AbYFQJjm (ORCPT ); Tue, 17 Jun 2008 05:39:42 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752642AbYFQJje (ORCPT ); Tue, 17 Jun 2008 05:39:34 -0400 Received: from yw-out-2324.google.com ([74.125.46.28]:18299 "EHLO yw-out-2324.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751594AbYFQJjc (ORCPT ); Tue, 17 Jun 2008 05:39:32 -0400 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=from:to:subject:date:user-agent:cc:references:in-reply-to :mime-version:content-disposition:message-id:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; b=GnwQdnS4ufCuYBNbOcuaKdjG9zb8moFXarVo+TyCu7DxvWZKKRz8DuFTI2xleW2uUc nqDrWPJdgTfilGbBYqY5ej3xosMp7fOg13Pzg8a/bkTLbulhEbQDfyHdJ2RTGlbmHw+8 ft+rLUVU4sJ/GtBwNltdZCnnNNwyKABnyAs4U= From: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz To: benh@kernel.crashing.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] ide-pmac: media-bay support fixes Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2008 11:41:08 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.9 Cc: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <200806162124.43005.bzolnier@gmail.com> <1213673979.8129.156.camel@pasglop> <1213674572.8129.159.camel@pasglop> In-Reply-To: <1213674572.8129.159.camel@pasglop> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200806171141.08865.bzolnier@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tuesday 17 June 2008, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote: > On Tue, 2008-06-17 at 13:39 +1000, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote: > > Your patches don't apply on today upstream, I'll try against > > linux-next or is there a git I can clone to test things ? > > Ok, I'm lost. I have 3 different series of patches from you partially > overlapping with different amount of patches in them. I don't have > time to sort that out right now. Can you send me a single serie that > I can apply on top of either upstream or tonight linux-next which > should have your stuff removed hopefully ? This patch series (from yesterday, the rest of can be ignored) should apply fine to the next revision of linux-next (later than -next-20080616, it is not out yet), if you prefer upstream patches I can look into it tonight. Thanks, Bart