From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1757268AbYFQJ5T (ORCPT ); Tue, 17 Jun 2008 05:57:19 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1754207AbYFQJ5H (ORCPT ); Tue, 17 Jun 2008 05:57:07 -0400 Received: from wr-out-0506.google.com ([64.233.184.224]:50756 "EHLO wr-out-0506.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753702AbYFQJ5E (ORCPT ); Tue, 17 Jun 2008 05:57:04 -0400 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=from:to:subject:date:user-agent:cc:references:in-reply-to :mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding :content-disposition:message-id; b=JDp/4pQHgXLE1MSHBWM7J+clatso0oDr/NjKvp5UYP7d+WHyYWYT9nrS7uKDdj48+h FBmdJ4Yza/mVD32npo1mtC9J2jhLjsgja2su3vGaIwrkaZNoq0/ICdnyl7t047033IBh rNReO8JTrOZd6t2ZerHSRmjGWPhGs1z6y8FYM= From: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz To: benh@kernel.crashing.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] ide-pmac: media-bay support fixes Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2008 11:58:34 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.9 Cc: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <200806162124.43005.bzolnier@gmail.com> <1213674572.8129.159.camel@pasglop> <200806171141.08865.bzolnier@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <200806171141.08865.bzolnier@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200806171158.35210.bzolnier@gmail.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tuesday 17 June 2008, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote: > On Tuesday 17 June 2008, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote: > > On Tue, 2008-06-17 at 13:39 +1000, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote: > > > Your patches don't apply on today upstream, I'll try against > > > linux-next or is there a git I can clone to test things ? > > > > Ok, I'm lost. I have 3 different series of patches from you partially > > overlapping with different amount of patches in them. I don't have > > time to sort that out right now. Can you send me a single serie that > > I can apply on top of either upstream or tonight linux-next which > > should have your stuff removed hopefully ? > > This patch series (from yesterday, the rest of can be ignored) should > apply fine to the next revision of linux-next (later than -next-20080616, > it is not out yet), if you prefer upstream patches I can look into it -next-20080617 is out now so please try it > tonight. > > Thanks, > Bart