public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@oracle.com>
To: "Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@oracle.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0 of 3] Block Layer Data Integrity
Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2008 18:57:02 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080617165701.GN20851@kernel.dk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <patchbomb.1213718275@sermon.lab.mkp.net>

On Tue, Jun 17 2008, Martin K. Petersen wrote:
> 
> These patches allow data integrity information (checksum and more) to
> be attached to I/Os at the block/filesystem layers and transferred
> through the entire I/O stack all the way to the physical storage
> device.
> 
> The integrity metadata can be generated in close proximity to the
> original data.  Capable host adapters, RAID arrays and physical disks
> can verify the data integrity and abort I/Os in case of a mismatch.
> 
> Changes:
> 
>  - Add "if in doubt" to Kconfig
> 
>  - Make blk_rq_count_integrity_sg() more readable
> 
>  - Queue integrity sysfs fixes
> 
>  - Fix two struct bi leaks
> 
>  - Rename struct bip to bio_integrity_payload
> 
>  - Introduce bio_integrity_hw_sectors() that converts from block layer
>    (512b) sectors to hardware sectors
> 
>  - Fix kunmap_atomic() abuse
> 
>  - Replace ?: constructs with if()
> 
>  - Add __GFP_NOFAIL to bio_integrity_prep() allocation

Thanks Martin, looks good to me now. Applied to pending 2.6.27 queue.

-- 
Jens Axboe


  parent reply	other threads:[~2008-06-17 16:57 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-06-17 15:57 [PATCH 0 of 3] Block Layer Data Integrity Martin K. Petersen
2008-06-17 15:57 ` [PATCH 1 of 3] block: Globalize bio_set and bio_vec_slab Martin K. Petersen
2008-06-17 15:57 ` [PATCH 2 of 3] block: Block layer data integrity support Martin K. Petersen
2008-06-17 15:57 ` [PATCH 3 of 3] block: Data integrity infrastructure documentation Martin K. Petersen
2008-06-17 16:57 ` Jens Axboe [this message]
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2008-06-16  4:10 [PATCH 0 of 3] Block Layer Data Integrity Martin K. Petersen

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20080617165701.GN20851@kernel.dk \
    --to=jens.axboe@oracle.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=martin.petersen@oracle.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox