From: Louis Rilling <Louis.Rilling@kerlabs.com>
To: Joel Becker <Joel.Becker@oracle.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, ocfs2-devel@oss.oracle.com
Subject: Re: [BUGFIX][PATCH 3/3] configfs: Fix failing symlink() making rmdir() fail
Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2008 13:40:43 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080618114043.GB30804@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080617221528.GA29091@mail.oracle.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 3143 bytes --]
On Tue, Jun 17, 2008 at 03:15:28PM -0700, Joel Becker wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 17, 2008 at 07:37:23PM +0200, Louis Rilling wrote:
> > For the parent's rmdir() case, we can use the same solution as with mkdir() vs
> > rmdir(). For the target's rmdir() case, we cannot, since we do not and cannot
> > lock the target's inode while in symlink(). Fortunately, once create_link()
> > terminates, no further operation can fail in symlink(). So we first reorder the
> > operations in create_link() to attach the new symlink to its target in last
> > place, and second handle symlink creation failure the same way as a new item
> > creation failure.
>
> Oh, no, ugh. We don't want to create vfs objects first and ask
> questions later. Otherwise we wouldn't need ATTACHING - we'd just
> create the symlink, then check dropping.
> If you have ATTACHING set, the rmdir cannot continue - you can
> check dropping at that time. That is, you keep the DROPPING check where
> it is - if it is already set, you know that rmdir() is going to complete
> successfully. You can bail before even calling configfs_create_link().
> If, however, it isn't set, your ATTACHING protects you from rmdir
> throughout.
The problem is rmdir() of the target item (see below). ATTACHING only protects
us from rmdir() of the parent. This is the exact reason why I attach the link to
the target in last place, where we know that we won't have to rollback.
And AFAICS, creating a VFS object can not hurt as long as we hold the
parent i_mutex, right? Otherwise there already is a problem in
configfs_attach_item() where a failure in populate_attrs() leads to rollback the
creation of the VFS object already created for the item.
>
> sl = kmalloc(sizeof(struct configfs_symlink), GFP_KERNEL);
> if (sl) {
> sl->sl_target = config_item_get(item);
> spin_lock(&configfs_dirent_lock);
> if (target_sd->s_type & CONFIGFS_USET_DROPPING) {
> spin_unlock(&configfs_dirent_lock);
> config_item_put(item);
> kfree(sl);
> return -ENOENT;
> /*
> * Force rmdir() of parent_item to wait until we know
> * if we succeed.
> */
> parent_sd->s_type |= CONFIGFS_USET_ATTACHING;
> }
> list_add(&sl->sl_list, &target_sd->s_links);
> spin_unlock(&configfs_dirent_lock);
> ret = configfs_create_link(sl, parent_item->ci_dentry,
> dentry);
> spin_lock(&configfs_dirent_lock);
> parent_sd->s_type &= ~CONFIGFS_USET_ATTACHING;
> if (ret) {
Here, if detach_prep() of the target failed because of the link attached above,
it had no means to retry. rmdir() of the target fails because of this
temporary link, which results in a failing symlink() making rmdir() of the
target fail.
> list_del_init(&sl->sl_list);
> spin_unlock(&configfs_dirent_lock);
> config_item_put(item);
> kfree(sl);
> } else
> spin_unlock(&configfs_dirent_lock);
> }
>
> return ret;
>
--
Dr Louis Rilling Kerlabs
Skype: louis.rilling Batiment Germanium
Phone: (+33|0) 6 80 89 08 23 80 avenue des Buttes de Coesmes
http://www.kerlabs.com/ 35700 Rennes
[-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-06-18 11:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-06-17 17:37 [BUGFIX][PATCH 0/3] configfs: symlink() fixes Louis Rilling
2008-06-17 17:37 ` [BUGFIX][PATCH 1/3] configfs: Fix symlink() to a removing item Louis Rilling
2008-06-17 22:17 ` Joel Becker
2008-06-17 17:37 ` [BUGFIX][PATCH 2/3] configfs: Rename CONFIGFS_USET_IN_MKDIR to CONFIGFS_USET_ATTACHING Louis Rilling
2008-06-17 17:37 ` [BUGFIX][PATCH 3/3] configfs: Fix failing symlink() making rmdir() fail Louis Rilling
2008-06-17 22:15 ` Joel Becker
2008-06-18 11:40 ` Louis Rilling [this message]
2008-06-18 20:11 ` Joel Becker
2008-06-19 9:28 ` Louis Rilling
2008-06-19 22:03 ` Joel Becker
2008-06-19 22:16 ` Joel Becker
2008-06-20 12:09 ` [PATCH] " Louis Rilling
2008-06-20 22:42 ` Joel Becker
2008-06-20 22:44 ` Joel Becker
2008-06-23 12:05 ` Louis Rilling
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20080618114043.GB30804@localhost \
--to=louis.rilling@kerlabs.com \
--cc=Joel.Becker@oracle.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ocfs2-devel@oss.oracle.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox