public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>
To: Jason Baron <jbaron@redhat.com>
Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	joe@perches.com, nick@nick-andrew.net, randy.dunlap@oracle.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/8] dynamic debug - core infrastructure
Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2008 09:08:12 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080618160812.GB9453@kroah.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080613190039.GC8813@redhat.com>

On Fri, Jun 13, 2008 at 03:00:39PM -0400, Jason Baron wrote:
> --- a/include/linux/device.h
> +++ b/include/linux/device.h
> @@ -595,6 +595,22 @@ extern const char *dev_driver_string(struct device *dev);
>  #ifdef DEBUG
>  #define dev_dbg(dev, format, arg...)		\
>  	dev_printk(KERN_DEBUG , dev , format , ## arg)
> +#elif defined(CONFIG_DYNAMIC_PRINTK_DEBUG)
> +#define dev_dbg(dev, format, ...) do {				    	     \
> +	static char mod_name[]						     \
> +	__attribute__((section("__verbose_strings")))			     \
> +	 = KBUILD_MODNAME;						     \
> +	static struct mod_debug foobar					     \
> +	__used								     \
> +	__attribute__((section("__verbose"), aligned(8))) =		     \
> +	{ mod_name, mod_name, "0", "0", NULL };				     \

Does the compiler merge all of these variables together into one within
the same file?

If not, should we have a new macro, one per file, for this information?

> --- a/include/linux/kernel.h
> +++ b/include/linux/kernel.h
> @@ -14,6 +14,7 @@
>  #include <linux/compiler.h>
>  #include <linux/bitops.h>
>  #include <linux/log2.h>
> +#include <linux/dynamic_printk.h>
>  #include <asm/byteorder.h>
>  #include <asm/bug.h>
>  
> @@ -288,15 +289,86 @@ extern void print_hex_dump_bytes(const char *prefix_str, int prefix_type,
>  #define pr_info(fmt, arg...) \
>  	printk(KERN_INFO fmt, ##arg)
>  
> -#ifdef DEBUG
> -/* If you are writing a driver, please use dev_dbg instead */

Hm, this comment is still correct, please don't delete it :)

Other than those minor nits, and the fact that your patch has a lot of
trailing whitespace, it's looking very good so far.

thanks,

greg k-h

  parent reply	other threads:[~2008-06-18 16:11 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-06-13 19:00 [PATCH 2/8] dynamic debug - core infrastructure Jason Baron
2008-06-13 22:30 ` Joe Perches
2008-06-16 19:15   ` Jason Baron
2008-06-18 16:08 ` Greg KH [this message]
2008-06-20 15:38   ` Jason Baron
2008-06-21  8:17     ` Greg KH
2008-06-18 20:52 ` Pavel Machek

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20080618160812.GB9453@kroah.com \
    --to=greg@kroah.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=jbaron@redhat.com \
    --cc=joe@perches.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=nick@nick-andrew.net \
    --cc=randy.dunlap@oracle.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox