From: Michael Buesch <mb@bu3sch.de>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Cc: "linux-kernel" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Subject: Re: Oops when using growisofs
Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2008 00:05:51 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200806230005.51356.mb@bu3sch.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200806222322.05706.arnd@arndb.de>
On Sunday 22 June 2008 23:22:04 Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > [28375.893181] Faulting instruction address: 0xc00000000012df84
> > [28375.893186] Oops: Kernel access of bad area, sig: 11 [#1]
> > [28375.893189] PREEMPT SMP NR_CPUS=4 NUMA PowerMac
>
> Ok, important information: ppc64 architecture. It would be nice to mention
> in the bug report, but here we can see it as well.
Yeah I'm sorry. I thought this was obvious. :)
> > [28375.893320] TASK = c00000011636db00[4667] 'kded' THREAD: c000000116ae8000 CPU: 2
>
> task was kded, i.e. not growisofs itself, thouh growisofs is probably the one
> that has caused this problem (by exausting memory).
I don't think it exausted memory. oom-killer messages would have been in the logs.
And this machine has 2.5GiB memory. It continued to run fine after restarting kded.
I sent this bugreport on the machine that oopsed without a reboot.
Is it possible that this was a kernel race between kded and growisofs?
This is a 4-way SMP machine.
> > [28375.893327] GPR00: c00000000012df70 c000000116aeb580 c00000000090ff20 0000000000000000
> > [28375.893340] GPR04: 0000000000010000 0000000000000001 c00000011bfe37a0 0000000000000010
> > [28375.893352] GPR08: f00000000694d280 0000000000000000 c0000000008c0be0 0000000000000000
> > [28375.893364] GPR12: 0000000028004842 c000000000941700 0000000000000004 c000000116aeb840
> > [28375.893377] GPR16: c0000001195d8f78 c0000000008c0cb8 c0000000000bd064 0000000000000003
> > [28375.893389] GPR20: 0000000000000000 c0000001195d8d68 0000000000000004 c0000001195d8f80
> > [28375.893402] GPR24: c00000000082c700 0000000000010000 f00000000694d280 0000000000000000
> > [28375.893415] GPR28: 0000000000000000 f00000000694d280 c00000000088e640 c000000116aeb580
>
> Note: r9 and r3 are both NULL pointers. r3 is the value returned from alloc_page_buffers.
> R9 is a copy of that, which gets accessed.
Hm, yeah. I looked at that code already, but I can't see how it could return
a NULL pointer.
> > [28375.893560] Instruction dump:
> > [28375.893566] f8010010 f821ff61 7cbb2b78 38a00001 7c7d1b78 7c3f0b78 4bfffe65 7c7c1b78
> > [28375.893586] 7c691b78 4800000c 60000000 7d695b78 <e9690008> e8090000 2fab0000 7c00db78
> > [28375.893607] ---[ end trace d2a7775e4472c36e ]---
> >
>
> 4800000c is the branch to alloc_page_buffers
> 7d695b78 copies the return value of that to r9
> e9690008 dereferences r9
>
> Evidently, alloc_page_buffers got an out of memory condition, which was not caught
> by create_empty_buffers. No idea how it should be handled, but the fact that it's
> not looks like a bug to me ;-).
alloc_page_buffers should never return a NULL pointer here, as far as I can see.
It clearly is a bug. An oops always is a bug.
--
Greetings Michael.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-06-22 22:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-06-22 16:18 Oops when using growisofs Michael Buesch
2008-06-22 21:22 ` Arnd Bergmann
2008-06-22 21:31 ` Arnd Bergmann
2008-06-22 22:09 ` Michael Buesch
2008-06-22 22:05 ` Michael Buesch [this message]
2008-06-22 22:28 ` Michael Buesch
2008-06-23 6:34 ` Andrew Morton
2008-06-23 6:59 ` Nick Piggin
2008-06-24 17:28 ` Jan Kara
2008-06-24 18:39 ` Michael Buesch
2008-06-25 1:42 ` Arnd Bergmann
2008-06-25 9:37 ` Jan Kara
2008-06-25 9:46 ` Michael Buesch
2008-06-26 17:05 ` Jan Kara
2008-06-26 18:11 ` Jens Axboe
2008-06-26 18:21 ` Michael Buesch
2008-06-26 18:36 ` Jens Axboe
2008-06-26 18:39 ` Michael Buesch
2008-06-26 18:41 ` Jens Axboe
2008-06-29 19:39 ` Michael Buesch
2008-07-09 18:46 ` Jan Kara
2008-07-22 9:25 ` Andrew Morton
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200806230005.51356.mb@bu3sch.de \
--to=mb@bu3sch.de \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox